The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants
Abstract
In a series of experiments, identification responses for place of articulation were obtained for synthetic stop consonants in consonant–vowel syllables with different vowels. The acoustic attributes of the consonants were systematically manipulated, the selection of stimulus characteristics being guided in part by theoretical considerations concerning the expected properties of the sound generated in the vocal tract as place of articulation is varied. Several stimulus series were generated with and without noise bursts at the onset, and with and without formant transitions following consonantal release. Stimuli with transitions only, and with bursts plus transitions, were consistently classified according to place of articulation, whereas stimuli with bursts only and no transitions were not consistently identified. The acoustic attributes of the stimuli were examined to determine whether invariant properties characterized each place of atriculation independent of vowel context. It was determined that the gross shape of the spectrum sampled at the consonantal release showed a distinctive shape for each place of articulation: a prominent midfrequency spectral peak for velars, a diffuse-rising spectrum for alveolars, and a diffuse-falling spectrum for labials. These attributes are evident for stimuli containing transitions only, but are enhanced by the presence of noise bursts at the onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
Cited by
Computational neuroanatomy of speech production
Hickok, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3158 · Cited by 837
Speech perception without traditional speech cues
Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell, T. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7233191 · Cited by 800
Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception
Matthen, M. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199268509.001.0001 · Cited by 333
Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques
Kuhl, P. K., & Padden, D. M. (1983) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.389148 · Cited by 231
Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance
Myers, E. B., Blumstein, S. E., Walsh, E., & Eliassen, J. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02380.x · Cited by 153
Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech
Young, E. D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2151 · Cited by 104
Smoking during pregnancy affects speech-processing ability in newborn infants
Key, A. P. F., Ferguson, M., Molfese, D. L., Peach, K., Lehman, C., & Molfese, V. J. (2007) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.9521 · Cited by 78
Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech
Benson, R. R., Richardson, M., Whalen, D. H., & Lai, S. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.029 · Cited by 50
Key, A. P., Yoder, P. J., & Stone, W. L. (2016) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12286 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, K. N., & Blumstein, S. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1978-11-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1358-1368
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2032625358
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.