Cited by 62Neuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology ResearchTactile and Sensory Interactions

Inner speech captures the perception of external speech

Open access
Scott, Mark, Yeung, H. Henny, Gick, Bryan, Werker, Janet F.·2013·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Talking silently to ourselves occupies much of our mental lives, yet the mechanisms underlying this experience remain unclear. The following experiments provide behavioral evidence that the auditory content of inner speech is provided by corollary discharge. Corollary discharge is the motor system's prediction of the sensory consequences of its actions. This prediction can bias perception of other sensations, pushing percepts to match with prediction. The two experiments below show this bias induced by inner speech, demonstrating that inner speech causes external sounds to be heard as similar to the imagined speech, and that this bias operates on subphonemic content.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.4794932

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Producing inner speech can have similar influences to overt speech on speech perception, such as priming perception of external sounds, suggesting that it too involves the sending of efference copies to receptive areas.

    “Producing inner speech can have similar influences to overt speech on speech perception, such as priming perception of external sounds (e.g., Scott, Yeung, Gick, & Werker, 2013), suggesting that it too involves the sending of efference copies to receptive areas.”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Scott, Yeung, Gick, & Werker, 2013

  • Generating inner speech "captured" the perception of ambiguous auditory sounds, suggesting the functioning of a forward model in shaping the perception of an incoming sensation.

    “In two experiments, Scott, Yeung, Gick, and Werker (2013) showed that generating inner speech “captured” the perception of ambiguous auditory sounds, suggesting the functioning of a forward model in shaping the perception of an incoming sensation, both when the vocalization was generated in inner speech and when it was silently mouthed (see Hubbard & Stoeckig, 1988, for a similar example of”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Scott, Yeung, Gick, and Werker, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Scott et al.: JASA Express Letters [http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4794932] Published Online 12 March 2013
  2. Scott et al.: JASA Express Letters [http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4794932] Published Online 12 March 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, M., Yeung, H. H., Gick, B., & Werker, J. F.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2013-03-12
Volume
133
Issue
4
Pages
EL286-EL292
ISSN
0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966375272
Cited by
62
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
inner speech, corollary discharge, auditory perception, silent speech, self-directed speech
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Pathways, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Imagination, Motor Neurons, Mouth, Phonetics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Thinking, Time Factors, Video Recording, Young Adult, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review