Cited by 166Action Observation and SynchronizationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismTactile and Sensory Interactions

Mental imagery of speech: linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation.

Open access
Tian, Xing, Poeppel, David·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

The neural basis of mental imagery has been investigated by localizing the underlying neural networks, mostly in motor and perceptual systems, separately. However, how modality-specific representations are top-down induced and how the action and perception systems interact in the context of mental imagery is not well understood. Imagined speech production ("articulation imagery"), which induces the kinesthetic feeling of articulator movement and its auditory consequences, provides a new angle because of the concurrent involvement of motor and perceptual systems. On the basis of previous findings in mental imagery of speech, we argue for the following regarding the induction mechanisms of mental imagery and the interaction between motor and perceptual systems: (1) Two distinct top-down mechanisms, memory retrieval and motor simulation, exist to induce estimation in perceptual systems. (2) Motor simulation is sufficient to internally induce the representation of perceptual changes that would be caused by actual movement (perceptual associations); however, this simulation process only has modulatory effects on the perception of external stimuli, which critically depends on context and task demands. Considering the proposed simulation-estimation processes as common mechanisms for interaction between motor and perceptual systems, we outline how mental imagery (of speech) relates to perception and production, and how these hypothesized mechanisms might underpin certain neural disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00314

Cites

127 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In inner speech, the sense of agency is derived from the comparison between desired and predicted signals.

    “In Rapin et al. (2013) and Lœvenbruck et al. (2018), it was argued that, in inner speech, the sense of agency is derived from the comparison between desired and predicted signals (see also Tian and Poeppel, 2012 and Swiney and Sousa, 2014).”

    From The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework (2019) · cites this paper as Tian and Poeppel, 2012

    In “Auditory hallucinations: intact estimation versus broken monitoring” (page unavailable), the paper links internal prediction and source monitoring to identifying perceptual signals as self-generated. But it does not say that the sense of agency in inner speech derives from comparing desired and predicted signals. “Mental imagery of speech as sequential estimation” instead describes comparing auditory predictions with auditory feedback for self-monitoring. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 131 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. von Holst E. Mittelstaedt H. (1973). The Reafference Principle (R. Martin, Trans.). The Behavioral Physiology of Animals and Man: The Collected Papers of Erich von Holst. (Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press), 139– 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, X., & Poeppel, D.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Tian, Xing
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
314-314
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104745961
Cited by
161
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005660)
  • Army Research Office (54228-LS-MUR)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
mental imagery, motor simulation, top-down modulation, memory retrieval, auditory perception, kinesthetic perception, speech production, neurological disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review