Cited by 31Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

Dietary Nitrate Fails to Improve 1 and 4 km Cycling Performance in Highly Trained Cyclists

Open access
McQuillan, Joseph A., Dulson, Deborah K., Laursen, Paul B., Kilding, Andrew E.·2017·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

We aimed to compare the effects of two different dosing durations of dietary nitrate (NO3-) supplementation on 1 and 4 km cycling time-trial performance in highly trained cyclists. In a double-blind crossover-design, nine highly trained cyclists ingested 140ml of NO3--rich beetroot juice containing ~8.0mmol [NO3-], or placebo, for seven days. Participants completed a range of laboratory-based trials to quantify physiological and perceptual responses and cycling performance: time-trials on day 3 and 6 (4km) and on day 4 and 7 (1km) of the supplementation period. Relative to placebo, effects following 3- and 4-days of NO3- supplementation were unclear for 4 (-0.8; 95% CL, ± 2.8%, p = .54) and likely harmful for 1km (-1.9; ± 2.5% CL, p = .17) time-trial mean power. Effects following 6- and 7-days of NO3- supplementation resulted in unclear effects for 4 (0.1; ± 2.2% CL, p = .93) and 1km (-0.9; ± 2.6%CL, p = .51) time-trial mean power. Relative to placebo, effects for 40, 50, and 60% peak power output were unclear for economy at days 3 and 6 of NO3- supplementation (p > .05). Dietary NO3- supplementation appears to be detrimental to 1km time-trial performance in highly trained cyclists after 4-days. While, extending NO3- dosing to ≥ 6-days reduced the magnitude of harm in both distances, overall performance in short duration cycling time-trials did not improve relative to placebo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2016-0212

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McQuillan, J. A., Dulson, D. K., Laursen, P. B., & Kilding, A. E.
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2017-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
255-263
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2564639765
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
dietary nitrate, beetroot juice, nitrate supplementation, cycling performance, time trial performance, cycling economy, peak power, duration of supplementation
MeSH terms
Fruit and Vegetable Juices, Adult, Bicycling, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Nitrates, Nitric Oxide, Oxygen Consumption, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Beta vulgaris, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review