Cited by 383Doping in SportsNutrition and Health StudiesComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Athletes and Supplements: Prevalence and Perspectives

Open access
Garthe, Ina, Maughan, Ronald J.·2018·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

In elite sport, where opponents are evenly matched, small factors can determine the outcome of sporting contests. Not all athletes know the value of making wise nutrition choices, but anything that might give a competitive edge, including dietary supplements, can seem attractive. Between 40% and 100% of athletes typically use supplements, depending on the type of sport, level of competition, and the definition of supplements. However, unless the athlete has a nutrient deficiency, supplementation may not improve performance and may have a detrimental effect on both performance and health. Dietary supplements are classified as a subcategory of food, so manufacturers are not required to provide evidence of product safety and efficacy, nor obtain approval from regulatory bodies before marketing supplements. This creates the potential for health risks, and serious adverse effects have been reported from the use of some dietary supplements. Athletes who compete in sports under an anti-doping code must also realize that supplement use exposes them to a risk of ingesting banned substances or precursors of prohibited substances. Government systems of regulations do not include specific laboratory testing for banned substances according to the WADA list, so a separate regulatory framework to evaluate supplements for their risk of provoking a failed doping test is needed. In the high-performance culture typical of elite sport, athletes may use supplements regardless of possible risks. A discussion around medical, physiological, cultural, and ethical questions may be warranted to ensure that the athlete has the information needed to make an informed choice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0429

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy results in an increased basal plasma osmolality, plasma volume expansion, and an earlier osmotic threshold for arginine vasopressin release (e.g. 280 vs. 285 mOsmol/kg H2O), but a reduction in urine output, resulting in greater overall fluid retention.

    “Estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy results in an increased basal plasma osmolality, plasma volume expansion, and an earlier osmotic threshold for arginine vasopressin release (e.g. 280 vs. 285 mOsmol/kg H2O), but a reduction in urine output, resulting in greater overall fluid retention.”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [281]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The higher overall fluid retention from estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy is not due to increased free-water retention, but rather increased sodium retention- the synthetic estrogens inducing a reduction in sodium excretion, eliciting a slight reduction in the hyponatremic risk.

    “However, the higher overall fluid retention is not due to increased free-water retention, but rather increased sodium retention- the synthetic estrogens inducing a reduction in sodium excretion [278,281], eliciting a slight reduction in the hyponatremic risk.”

    From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [281]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nordic Council of Ministers. (2014). Integrating nutrition and physical activity 2012 (5th ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Author.
  2. 0b013e31818f169e · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garthe, I., & Maughan, R. J.
Affiliations
  • The Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederation of Sport
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
126-138
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2794494875
Cited by
383
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Anti-Doping Agency
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
dietary supplements, athletes, elite sport, anti-doping, banned substances, supplement regulation, supplement safety, ergogenic aids, dietary supplementation, informed choice
MeSH terms
Doping in Sports, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Dietary Supplements, Athletes, Performance-Enhancing Substances, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review