Cited by 17Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFoot and Ankle SurgerySports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Reliability and validity of instrumented soccer equipment

Akins, Jonathan S., Heebner, Nicholas R., Lovalekar, Mita, Sell, Timothy C.·2015·Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Abstract

Ankle ligament sprains are the most common injury in soccer. The high rate of these injuries demonstrates a need for novel data collection methodologies. Therefore, soccer shoes and shin guards were instrumented with inertial sensors to measure ankle joint kinematics in the field. The purpose of this study was to assess test-retest reliability and concurrent criterion validity of a kinematic assessment using the instrumented soccer equipment. Twelve soccer athletes performed athletic maneuvers in the laboratory and field during 2 sessions. In the laboratory, ankle joint kinematics were simultaneously measured with the instrumented equipment and a conventional motion analysis system. Reliability was assessed using ICC and validity was assessed using correlation coefficients and RMSE. While our design criteria of good test-retest reliability was not supported (ICC > .80), sagittal plane ICCs were mostly fair to good and similar to motion analysis results; and sagittal plane data were valid (r = .90-98; RMSE < 5°). Frontal and transverse plane data were not valid (r < .562; RMSE > 3°). Our results indicate that the instrumented soccer equipment can be used to measure sagittal plane ankle joint kinematics. Biomechanical studies support the utility of sagittal plane measures for lower extremity injury prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jab.2014-0191

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akins, J. S., Heebner, N. R., Lovalekar, M., & Sell, T. C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Akins, Jonathan S.
Venue
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Published
2015-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
195-201
ISSN
  • 1065-8483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2688
OpenAlex
W2163980277
Cited by
17
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Business Machines Corporation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
inertial sensors, ankle kinematics, football injuries, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, sagittal plane, shin guards, soccer shoes, lower extremity injury prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Ankle Joint, Equipment Design, Humans, Male, Protective Devices, Sensitivity and Specificity, Shoes, Soccer, Reproducibility of Results, Range of Motion, Articular, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Sports Equipment, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review