Cited by 63Human-Animal Interaction StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

The Physiological Function of Oxytocin in Humans and Its Acute Response to Human-Dog Interactions: A Review of the Literature

Powell, Lauren, Guastella, Adam J., McGreevy, Paul, Bauman, Adrian, Edwards, Kate M., Stamatakis, Emmanuel·2019·Journal of Veterinary Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.10.008

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, L., Guastella, A. J., McGreevy, P., Bauman, A., Edwards, K. M., & Stamatakis, E.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Powell, Lauren
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
30
Pages
25-32
ISSN
1558-7878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898400737
Cited by
63
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Veterinary Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney (183100)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, human-dog interaction, endogenous oxytocin, stress reactivity, cardiovascular function, human health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review