Cited by 251Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesSport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Perfectionism, Fear of Failure, and Affective Responses to Success and Failure: The Central Role of Fear of Experiencing Shame and Embarrassment

Open access
Sagar, Sam S., Stoeber, Joachim·2009·Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated how aspects of perfectionism in athletes ( N = 388) related to the fears of failure proposed by Conroy et al. (2002), and how perfectionism and fears of failure predicted positive and negative affect after imagined success and failure in sports competitions. Results showed that perfectionistic personal standards showed a negative relationship with fear of experiencing shame and embarrassment and a positive relationship with positive affect after success, whereas perfectionistic concern over mistakes and perceived parental pressure showed a positive relationship with fear of experiencing shame and embarrassment and with negative affect after failure. Moreover, fear of experiencing shame and embarrassment fully mediated the relationship between perfectionistic concern and negative affect and between coach pressure and negative affect. The findings demonstrate that fear of experiencing shame and embarrassment is central in the relationship between perfectionism and fear of failure, and that perfectionistic concern about mistakes and perceived coach pressure are aspects of perfectionism that predict fear of experiencing shame and embarrassment and negative affect after failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jsep.31.5.602

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-regulation failure via problems in managing setbacks and failures has been linked to perfectionism and procrastination individually within other domains, and may therefore also be relevant for understanding how perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings relate to procrastination within the health domain.

    “Self-regulation failure via problems in managing setbacks and failures (i.e., the discrepancy between current and desired states) have been linked to perfectionism and procrastination individually within other domains (e.g., Pychyl & Sirois, 2016; Sagar & Stoeber, 2009; Sirois et al., 2010), and may therefore also be relevant for understanding how perfectionistic concerns and perfectionist”

    From A Meta–Analytic and Conceptual Update on the Associations between Procrastination and Multidimensional Perfectionism (2017) · cites this paper as Sagar & Stoeber, 2009

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinant of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
  2. Clements, M. (2008). Perfecting the perfectionist: Getting the balance right. Sports Coach, 30(2), 20-21.
  3. Hall, H. K. (2006). Perfectionism: A hallmark quality of world class performers, or a psychological impediment to athletic development? In D. Hackfort & G. Tenenbaum (Eds.), Essential processes for attaining peak performance (Vol. 1, pp. 178-211). Oxford, UK: Meyer & Meyer.
  4. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Underwood, J. (1978). Taking the fun out of a game. In R. Martens (Ed.), Joy and sadness in children's sports (pp. 50-64). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sagar, S. S., & Stoeber, J.
Affiliations
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Venue
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2009-10
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
602-627
ISSN
  • 0895-2779 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2904
OpenAlex
W2167453298
Cited by
249
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
perfectionism, fear of failure, fear of embarrassment, athletes, mediation
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Character, Defense Mechanisms, Fear, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Shame, Socialization, Sports, Stress, Psychological, Self Efficacy, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review