Cited by 168Cardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsVascular anomalies and interventionsLiver physiology and pathology

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Is Required for Developmental Closure of the Ductus Venosus in the Neonatal Mouse

Lahvis, Garet P., Pyzalski, Robert W., Glover, Edward, Pitot, Henry C., McElwee, Matthew K., Bradfield, Christopher A.·2005·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

A developmental role for the Ahr locus has been indicated by the observation that mice harboring a null allele display a portocaval vascular shunt throughout life. To define the ontogeny and determine the identity of this shunt, we developed a visualization approach in which three-dimensional (3D) images of the developing liver vasculature are generated from serial sections. Applying this 3D visualization approach at multiple developmental times allowed us to demonstrate that the portocaval shunt observed in Ahr-null mice is the remnant of an embryonic structure and is not acquired after birth. We observed that the shunt is found in late-stage wild-type embryos but closes during the first 48 h of postnatal life. In contrast, the same structure fails to close in Ahr-null mice and remains open throughout adulthood. The ontogeny of this shunt, along with its 3D position, allowed us to conclude that this shunt is a patent developmental structure known as the ductus venosus (DV). Upon searching for a physiological cause of the patent DV, we observed that during the first 48 h, most major hepatic veins, such as the portal and umbilical veins, normally decrease in diameter but do not change in Ahr-null mice. This observation suggests that failure of the DV to close may be the consequence of increased blood pressure or a failure in vasoconstriction in the developing liver.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/mol.104.008888

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ahr null mice show a patent ductus venosus with complete penetrance.

    “Mice null for Ahr exhibit a patent DV with 100% penetrance, though the AHR-driven genes responsible for shunt closer remain unknown.”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Lahvis et al., 2005

  • Early characterization of Ahr null mice from our own laboratory uncovered significant vascular phenotypes, including the patent ductus venosus in the liver and a hyaloid artery in the eye, both of which are normal fetal structures that typically resolve shortly after birth.

    “Early characterization of these null mice from our own laboratory uncovered significant vascular phenotypes, including the patent ductus venosus (DV) in the liver and a hyaloid artery in the eye, both of which are normal fetal structures that typically resolve shortly after birth (Lahvis et al., 2000; Lahvis et al., 2005; J. V. Schmidt et al., 1996).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Lahvis et al., 2005

  • Ahrnls mice are resistant to TCDD-induced toxicity and exhibit a patent ductus venosus through adulthood.

    “In early experiments employing this model, the Ahrnls mice were found to be resistant to TCDD-induced toxicity and exhibit a patent DV through adulthood.”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Lahvis et al., 2005

  • The Ahrnls model is a phenocopy of the Ahr null mouse.

    “These observations suggest the Ahrnls model is a phenocopy of the Ahr null mouse (Bunger et al., 2003; Lahvis et al., 2005).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Lahvis et al., 2005

  • Patent ductus venosus is among the most easily assessed and penetrant AHR-mediated phenotypes.

    “The patent DV is one of the most easily assessed and penetrant AHR-mediated phenotypes (Harstad et al., 2006; Lahvis et al., 2000; Lahvis et al., 2005).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Lahvis et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lahvis, G. P., Pyzalski, R. W., Glover, E., Pitot, H. C., McElwee, M. K., & Bradfield, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
714-720
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154532970
Cited by
168
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f32es005887-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA022484, P30CA014520)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (F32-ES05887, R01ES013566, F32ES005877)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
aryl hydrocarbon receptor, ductus venosus, portacaval shunt, hepatic vein, vasoconstriction, postnatal development
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Capillaries, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Hepatic Veins, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Portal Vein, Vena Cava, Inferior, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review