Cited by 207Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 19 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Quantum walks and wavepacket dynamics on a lattice with twisted photons

Open access

Abstract

A discrete quantum walk occurs in the orbital angular momentum space of light, both for a single photon and for two simultaneous photons.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A discrete quantum walk is realized in the orbital angular momentum (OAM) space of light, using spin-orbit coupling in q-plates, for both single photons and two indistinguishable photons. The same platform enables step-by-step wavepacket dynamics, band-structure/topological measurements, and observation of multiparticle interference.

Key findings

  • The authors demonstrate a photonic QW in a single light beam, encoding the coin in spin angular momentum (SAM) and the walker in OAM, with q-plates implementing conditional OAM shifts of ±1.
  • Single-photon four-step QWs with localized input show experimental/theoretical similarities of 94.7 ± 0.4%, 93.4 ± 0.5%, 99.7 ± 0.1%, and 99.2 ± 0.2% across standard and hybrid configurations.
  • Gaussian OAM wavepackets propagate according to the QW band dispersion; five-step wavepacket similarities reach 98.2 ± 0.4% and 99.0 ± 0.2%, and varying quasi-momentum across the Brillouin zone verifies the topological class via a single full rotation of the SAM eigenstate on the Poincaré sphere.
  • Two-photon three-step QWs show two-photon interference: standard-case total variation distance is 6.5 ± 0.9% from indistinguishable-photon theory versus 16.5 ± 0.9% from distinguishable-photon theory; hybrid-case values are 13.5 ± 0.7% versus 21.1 ± 0.7%.

Methods

  • Design: discrete-time QW with coin in SAM and walker in OAM; a step is implemented by wave plates and a q-plate with q = 1/2, using QWP-QP-HWP for localized single-photon walks and QP plus QWP for wavepacket and two-photon experiments.
  • Data/sample: photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion; single-photon experiments used heralded photons, while two-photon experiments sent both photons through the QW setup after preparing input polarization |R⟩|L⟩.
  • Analysis: projective measurements in polarization and OAM, compared with theory using a similarity measure S and total variation distance (TVD); wavepacket experiments prepared Gaussian OAM envelopes and varied average quasi-momentum k0 in steps of π/8 across (0, π).

Limitations

  • The authors state that the walk evolution cannot be position-dependent (OAM-dependent), unlike some other implementations, though they suggest possible future fixes using azimuthal-coordinate elements or the radial beam coordinate.
  • The authors state that the platform cannot simulate particle interactions, a limitation common to fully photonic QW implementations.
  • The authors note that the linear scaling advantage holds only in the optical near-field; in the far-field, the transverse size of optical components would have to increase with the OAM range.
  • The authors attribute residual discrepancies between observed two-photon distributions and indistinguishable-photon theory to systematic errors from imperfect alignment of the setup.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.1500087

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

12 of 19 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 11
32 of 32

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Quasi-momentum range excludes plotted endpoints

    Minor

    The stated range (0, π) excludes both endpoints, but the same figure caption says results are shown for k0 = 0 and k0 = π.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Cardano, F., Massa, F., Qassim, H., Karimi, E., Slussarenko, S., Paparo, D., de Lisio, C., Sciarrino, F., Santamato, E., Boyd, R. W., & Marrucci, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Marrucci, Lorenzo
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2015-03-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
e1500087-e1500087
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163382649
Cited by
207
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8
FWCI
17.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (ID0EWVAE648, 255914)
  • European Research Council (ID0EN4AE649, 307783)
  • Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada (ID0E65AE650, ID0EOAAG651)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum walks, orbital angular momentum of light, twisted photons, photonic quantum simulation, wave packet dynamics, electronic band structure, momentum space, Gaussian wave packets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review