Cited by 579Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apes Save Tools for Future Use

Abstract

Planning for future needs, not just current ones, is one of the most formidable human cognitive achievements. Whether this skill is a uniquely human adaptation is a controversial issue. In a study we conducted, bonobos and orangutans selected, transported, and saved appropriate tools above baseline levels to use them 1 hour later (experiment 1). Experiment 2 extended these results to a 14-hour delay between collecting and using the tools. Experiment 3 showed that seeing the apparatus during tool selection was not necessary to succeed. These findings suggest that the precursor skills for planning for the future evolved in great apes before 14 million years ago, when all extant great ape species shared a common ancestor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1125456

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. E. Tulving, in The Missing Link in Cognition: Evolution of Self-Knowing Consciousness, H. Terrace, J. Metcalfe, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2004), pp. 3–56.
  2. T. Suddendorf, M. C. Corballis, Gen. Soc. Gen. Psych. Mon.123, 133 (1997).
  3. G. Gergely, G. Csibra, Inter. Stud.6, 463 (2004).
  4. T. Kano The Last Ape (Stanford Univ. Press Stanford CA 1992).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–579 of 579

Metadata

Authors
Mulcahy, N. J., & Call, J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Call, Josep
Venue
Science
Published
2006-05-19
Volume
312
Issue
5776
Pages
1038-1040
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2033421187
Cited by
578
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 35
FWCI
38.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
tool use, future planning, tool selection, bonobos, orangutans, great apes, cognitive evolution, human evolution, delay of gratification, common ancestor
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Pan troglodytes, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Mental Processes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review