The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future
Abstract
We are all faced with uncertainty about the future, but we can get the measure of some uncertainties in terms of probabilities. Probabilities are notoriously difficult to communicate effectively to lay audiences, and in this review we examine current practice for communicating uncertainties visually, using examples drawn from sport, weather, climate, health, economics, and politics. Despite the burgeoning interest in infographics, there is limited experimental evidence on how different types of visualizations are processed and understood, although the effectiveness of some graphics clearly depends on the relative numeracy of an audience. Fortunately, it is increasingly easy to present data in the form of interactive visualizations and in multiple types of representation that can be adjusted to user needs and capabilities. Nonetheless, communicating deeper uncertainties resulting from incomplete or disputed knowledge--or from essential indeterminacy about the future--remains a challenge.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, to overcome the adverse effect of denominator neglect, it is important to present ratios with the same denominator so that they can be compared with just the numerator [116].”
From Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty (2021) · cites this paper as [116]
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Fixing the communications failure
Kahan, D. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/463296a · Cited by 602
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S35 · DOI
- B. de Finetti Theory of Probability (Wiley London 1974).
- D. Kahneman P. Slovic A. Tversky Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge 2006).
- 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.741 · DOI
- Fagerlin A., Ubel P. A., Smith D. M., Zikmund-Fisher B. J., Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication. Am. J. Health Behav. 31 (suppl. 1), S47 (2007).17931136 · DOI
- D. E. Nelson B. W. Hesse R. T. Croyle Making Data Talk: Communicating Public Health Data to the Public Policy Makers and the Press (Oxford Univ. Press New York ed. 1 2009). · DOI
- C. Skubisz T. Reimer U. Hoffrage in Communication Yearbook 33 (Routledge London 2009) pp. 177–211. · DOI
- 10.1197/jamia.M2115 · DOI
- Lipkus I. M., Hollands J. G., The visual communication of risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 1999, 149 (1999).10854471 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X07307271 · DOI
- 10.1196/annals.1399.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x · DOI
- Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. V., Rapoport A., Zwick R., Forsyth B., Measuring the vague meaning of probabilistic terms. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 155, 348 (1986). · DOI
- 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.481 · DOI · Paper page
- Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W., Kurz-Milcke E., Schwartz L. M., Woloshin S., Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 8, 53 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103 · DOI
- 10.1175/2008WAF2007088.1 · DOI
- 10.1196/annals.1399.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X10369000 · DOI
- Neace W. P., Michaud S., Bolling L., Deer K., Zecevic L., Frequency formats, probability formats, or problem structure? A test of the nested-sets hypothesis in an extensional reasoning task. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 3, 140 (2008). · DOI
- 10.1002/met.121 · DOI
- E. Tufte The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Graphics Press Cheshire CT 2001).
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01435.x · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.695 · DOI
- NASA Space Shuttle Safety and Mission Assurance Office NASA Review of Shuttle Risks (available at http://hw.libsyn.com/p/3/0/a/30aafb8c2337eb80/NASAShuttleRiskReview-excerpt.pdf).
- 10.1002/cncr.23959 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0014474 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X10369006 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-6947-8-14 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01261.x · DOI
- 10.1175/2009JCLI2863.1 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVCG.2009.114 · DOI
- K. Broad et al . Misinterpretations of the “Cone of Uncertainty” in Florida During the 2004 Hurricane Season (2010) (available at http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-88-5-651). · DOI
- 10.1559/1523040054738936 · DOI
- 10.1559/152304000783548037 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.229.4716.828 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00488.x · DOI
- Strecher V. J., Greenwood T., Wang C., Dumont D., Interactive multimedia and risk communication. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 1999, 134 (1999).10854469 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X10364847 · DOI
- 10.1111/1539-6924.00304 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X07307270 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X10371830 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Rogers S. S. N. Siu D. Luesley A. Bryant H. O. Dickinson in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews The Cochrane Collaboration L. Rogers Eds. (Wiley Chichester UK 2009).
- M. G. Morgan B. Fischhoff A. Bostrom C. J. Atman Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge ed. 1 2001). · DOI
- 10.1038/4681029a · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 557
Berger, L., Berger, N., Bosetti, V., Gilboa, I., Hansen, L. P., Jarvis, C., Marinacci, M., & Smith, R. D. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3647188 · Cited by 22
“…of different quality, and to help policymakers to turn it into actionable information for decisions, while making sure the complete range of uncertainty (including within and across models) is clearly reported and understood properly (Spiegelhalter, Pearson, and Short 2011; Bosetti et al. 2017).”
BackgroundDomains of uncertainty visualization research: a visual summary approach
Mason, J. S., Retchless, D., & Klippel, A. (2017) · doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1154804 · Cited by 22
An expandable web-based platform for visually analyzing basin-scale hydro-climate time series data
Smith, J. P., Hunter, T., Clites, A., Stow, C., Slawecki, T., Muhr, G. C., & Gronewold, A. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.005 · Cited by 22
“The GLWLD and GLHCD were developed with a focus on ease of use and ability of the general public to understand data being presented without being overwhelmed (Kelleher and Wagener, 2011; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundCommunicating quantitative information about unexploded ordnance risks to the public.
Gibson, J., Rowe, A., Stone, E. R., & de Bruin, W. B. (2013) · Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1021/es305254j · Cited by 22
Wrangling Phosphoproteomic Data to Elucidate Cancer Signaling Pathways
Grimes, M. L., Lee, W.-J., van der Maaten, L. J. P., & Shannon, P. T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052884 · Cited by 21
“The human mind’s appreciation of shape also comes into play when constructing informative graphics [47,48].”
BackgroundA Sampling Framework for Uncertainty in Individual Environmental Decisions
Galešić, M., Kause, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12172 · Cited by 24
Effectiveness of a Segmental Approach to Climate Policy
Trancik, J. E., Chang, M. T., Karapataki, C., & Stokes, L. C. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es305093c · Cited by 34
Aleatory-aware deep uncertainty quantification for transfer learning
Kabir, H. M. D., Khanam, S., Khozeimeh, F., Khosravi, A., Mondal, S. K., Nahavandi, S., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105246 · Cited by 19
Communicating infectious disease prevalence through graphics: results from an international survey
Fagerlin, A., Valley, T., Scherer, A., Knaus, M., Das, E., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. (2017) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.048 · Cited by 21
“Experimental evidence remains limited as to how different graphics are processed and understood [51]; therefore, additional research is necessary to evaluate the impact of public health graphics aimed at the general population.”
Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids
Stellamanns, J., Ruetters, D., Dahal, K. P., Schillmöller, Z., & Hübner, J. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.003 · Cited by 18
Marti, M., Dallo, I., Roth, P., Papadopoulos, A. N., & Zaugg, S. (2023) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103674 · Cited by 20
Lee, S. H., Pandya, R. K., Hussain, J., Lau, R., Chambers, E. A. B., Geng, A., Jin, B. X., Zhou, O., Wu, T., Barr, L., et al. (2022) · Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine · doi:10.1080/17453054.2021.2020625 · Cited by 31
“Infographics have been shown to not only enhance information comprehension and recall, but they also help people cope with future uncertainties in a public health context (Spiegelhalter, Pearson, & Short, 2011).”
BackgroundRipberger, J., Bell, A., Fox, A., Forney, A., Livingston, W., Gaddie, C., Silva, C. L., & JENKINS-SMITHa, H. (2022) · Weather, Climate, and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-21-0034.1 · Cited by 20
Why Visualize? Untangling a Large Network of Arguments
Streeb, D., El-Assady, M., Keim, D., & Chen, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2940026 · Cited by 20
“[44], [61], [68], [75] Rerepresentation Visualizations re-represent structures T U D”
BackgroundMaes, A. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3251 · Cited by 20
A Practical Approach to Address Uncertainty in Stakeholder Deliberations
Gregory, R., & Keeney, R. L. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12638 · Cited by 41
fanplot: An R Package for Visualising Sequential Distributions
Abel, G. (2015) · The R Journal · doi:10.32614/rj-2015-002 · Cited by 20
“Probabilities are notoriously difficult to communicate effectively to lay audiences (Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundFostering Risk Literacy in Elementary School
Till, C. (2014) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/283 · Cited by 20
“These subjective criteria are influenced by past experiences, family, friends or cultural beliefs (Spiegelhalter, Pearson & Short, 2011).”
Sivle, A., Kolstø, S. D., Hansen, P. J. K., & Kristiansen, J. (2014) · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-12-00054.1 · Cited by 20
Henneman, L., Oosterwijk, J., van Asperen, C. V., Menko, F., Ockhuysen-Vermey, C. F., Kostense, P., Claassen, L., & Timmermans, D. (2013) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 · Cited by 20
“Icon arrays allow the illustration of quantitative part-to-whole proportions and can counter framing effects and denominator neglect, since the size of the population is taken into account [13,18,19].”
BackgroundGuide to Vulnerability Analysis for Computer Networks and Systems
Crampton, A. (2018) · Computer Communications and Networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92624-7 · Cited by 20
“Clustering animations can be particularly enlightening; see [71] and [72] for k-means and EM clustering animations, respectively.”
Communicating future climate projections of precipitation change
Daron, J., Lorenz, S., Taylor, A. L., & Dessai, S. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03118-9 · Cited by 19
“…a range of approaches are used in practice, evidence of how different audiences interpret visualisations of climate projections remains limited and represents a key gap in our knowledge to improve the translation of climate science into services (Spiegelhalter et al. 2011; Christel et al. 2018).”
BackgroundCoyle, M., & Gillies, K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242239 · Cited by 19
“Speigelhalter et al have shown that probabilities are ‘notoriously difficult to communicate effectively’ to lay audiences in various contexts, including health [12].”
BackgroundKause, A., de Bruin, W. B., Fung, F., Taylor, A. L., & Lowe, J. A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072955 · Cited by 25
“This calls for communication formats that allow stakeholders to make adequate adaptation decisions and to integrate uncertainties into their decisions [24].”
BackgroundHelping consumers to evaluate annual percentage rates (APR) on credit cards.
Chin, A., & de Bruin, W. B. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000197 · Cited by 16
Habs, M. R., Binder, K., Krauß, S., Müller, K., Ernst, B., Valentini, L., & Koller, M. T. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9070717 · Cited by 25
Peeters, P. C., Biesen, W. V., Veys, N., Lemahieu, W. P. D., Moor, B. D., & Meester, J. D. (2016) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0253-3 · Cited by 20
“Results of the score and the associated risk, if presented in a format the patient can understand, can be of real value in guiding a shared decision making by creating realistic expectations about the treatment [18–20].”
The role of data visualization in Railway Big Data Risk Analysis
Figueres-Esteban, M., Hughes, P., & van Gulijk, C. (2015) · doi:10.1201/b19094-377 · Cited by 19
Harrison, D., Griggs, K., Prabhu, G., Gomes, M., Lecky, F., Hutchinson, P., Menon, D., & Rowan, K. (2015) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3628 · Cited by 19
“The recalibrated risk prediction models have the potential to be clinically useful at the individual patient level both to aid communication between health care professionals and in communicating risks to patients and their loved ones to enable shared decision-making.(55) We would recommend that the models be used as…”
Leach, A. W., Levontin, P., Holt, J., Kell, L., & Mumford, J. (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.010 · Cited by 19
Kim, S., Kim, J., Choi, Y., Shin, J., & Morrison, A. (2022) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.03.019 · Cited by 18
Decisions, uncertainty and spatial information
Lark, R., Chagumaira, C., & Milne, A. (2022) · Spatial Statistics · doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100619 · Cited by 18
Visualisation of law and legal Process: An opportunity missed
McLachlan, S., & Webley, L. (2020) · Information Visualization · doi:10.1177/14738716211012608 · Cited by 18
“Identifying the most appropriate way to visualise information and communicate its messages depends on the presenters’ objective, the communication context and the target audience.(25,27) While target audience likes and dislikes should be taken into consideration, they must not be treated as the single defining standar…”
BackgroundAssessment of health education infographics in Saudi Arabia
Jahan, S., Al-Saigul, A., & Alharbi, A. (2020) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/0017896920949600 · Cited by 18
“Research has shown that when compared to text, images can be more effective in communicating information (Katz et al., 2006; Wilkinson et al., 2016), as they increase understanding and retention of the presented information (Murray et al., 2017, 2018; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundLewis, S. C., King, A. D., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E., & Wehner, M. F. (2019) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2019ef001273 · Cited by 23
“Graphics can be used with numbers and text to summarize probability data concisely in many contexts, including climate change and projections (Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundDamhus, C., Petersen, G. B., Ploug, T., & Brodersen, J. (2018) · Health, Risk and Society · doi:10.1080/13698575.2018.1499877 · Cited by 18
Giroux, M., Park, J., Kim, J.-E., Choi, Y., Lee, J. C., Kim, S., Jang, S., Gonzalez-Jimenez, H., & Kim, J. (2021) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1177/18393349211028670 · Cited by 17
“First, we draw on prior literature and theoretical models indicating that the anticipated health consequences of a threat may affect an individual’s behaviour (Bonner & Newell, 2008; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
Okan, Y., Stone, E. R., Parillo, J., de Bruin, W. B., & Parker, A. M. (2020) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13431 · Cited by 17
Løhre, E., Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., Teigen, K. H., & Shepherd, T. G. (2019) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-18-0136.1 · Cited by 23
“Teigen (1990) found that people placed more confidence in precise statements than in vague statements, but also that people chose the more precise statement when asked which statement they would be more skeptical about.”
BackgroundPei, B., Xing, W., & Lee, H. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12741 · Cited by 19
Emotion computing using Word Mover’s Distance features based on Ren_CECps
Ren, F., & Liu, N. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194136 · Cited by 21
Smart Cities and M3: Rapid Research, Meaningful Metrics and Co-Design
Bell, S., Benatti, F., Edwards, N., Laney, R., Morse, D., Piccolo, L. S. G., & Zanetti, O. (2017) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-017-9415-x · Cited by 17
“Numerous techniques exist for presenting uncertainty information to non-expert users, such as the use of blur and transparency, cf. the review of Bonneau et al. 2014, and the frequency-based diagrams exemplified in the review by Spiegelhalter et al. (2011).”
MethodWheeler, A. P. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2551472 · Cited by 17
“Effectively visualizing and conveying uncertainty in the estimates is difficult (Spiegelhalter et al., 2011), but with the moving average one can see the typical values for each crime, see any longer term trends, and monitor if a particular week is outlying.”
BackgroundWilde, A., Mitchell, P., Meiser, B., & Schofield, P. (2013) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22000 · Cited by 17
“Large variation in the way people understand risk information complicates how genetic test result recipients might respond to such information.[57] Although “low-risk” results might provide relief or reassurance, as shown in a randomized control trial of disclosure of a marker for Alzheimer disease,[58] there is also…”
BackgroundCommunicating about Risks and Safe Use of Medicines: Real Life and Applied Research
Bahri, P. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3013-5 · Cited by 17
The role of visual framing in marine conservation communication
Ison, S., Cvitanovic, C., Pecl, G., Hobday, A., & van Putten, I. V. (2024) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106938 · Cited by 16
Value of Information: Exploring Behavioral and Social Factors
Glynn, P. D., Chiavacci, S. J., Rhodes, C. R., HELGESON, J. F., Shapiro, C. D., & Straub, C. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.805245 · Cited by 19
“The idea that additional information always reduces uncertainty tends to support confirmation bias and framing and anchoring biases in the evaluation and use of information (Nickerson, 1998; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSavadori, L., Ronzani, P., Sillari, G., Bucci, D. D., & Dolce, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.743172 · Cited by 16
“Risk messages that incorporate numbers, probabilities, or percentages are often used to communicate risk to the public (Lipkus and Hollands, 1999; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011; van der Bles et al., 2020).”
BackgroundCleary, E., Hetzel, M. W., Siba, P. M., Lau, C. L., & Clements, A. (2021) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-021-03804-0 · Cited by 20
“The inherent ability of BDN models to represent the reliability of prevalence maps associated with uncertainty in spatial prevalence prediction can be of particular benefit in communicating information to national control programmes [15, 46, 47].”
BackgroundLingard, H., Blismas, N., Harley, J., Stranieri, A., Zhang, R., & Pirzadeh, P. (2018) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-07-2016-0174 · Cited by 16
Educating patients and providers through comprehensive pharmacogenetic test reports.
Haga, S. (2017) · Pharmacogenomics (London) · doi:10.2217/pgs-2017-0088 · Cited by 16
Ruysscher, D. D. D., Defraene, G., Ramaekers, B., Lambin, P., Briers, E., Stobart, H., Ward, T., Bentzen, S., van Staa, T. V., Azria, D., et al. (2016) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.003 · Cited by 16
Effect of visual aids and individual differences of cognitive traits in judgments on food safety
Honda, H., Ogawa, M., Murakoshi, T., Masuda, T., Utsumi, K., Park, S., Kimura, A., Nei, D., & Wada, Y. (2015) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.05.010 · Cited by 16
Rowe, H. J., & Fisher, J. (2015) · Women s Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.05.002 · Cited by 13
Impact of abundance data errors on the uncertainty of an ecological water quality assessment index
Gobeyn, S., Bennetsen, E., Echelpoel, W. V., Everaert, G., & Goethals, P. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.031 · Cited by 16
Imagining futures: Cognitive processes of desirable or undesirable project prospections
Stingl, V., & Geraldi, J. G. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122701 · Cited by 18
van Gils, A. M., Visser, L. N. C., Hendriksen, H. M. A., Georges, J., van der Flier, W. M., & Rhodius‐Meester, H. F. M. (2022) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1002/dad2.12333 · Cited by 18
Larionov, A., Nezhnikova, E., & Smirnova, E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132413539 · Cited by 15
“Unpredictable large deviations are very rare but should be considered as their cumulative effect is significant [59].”
BackgroundXexakis, G., & Trutnevyte, E. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102324 · Cited by 18
Natural frequency trees improve diagnostic efficiency in Bayesian reasoning
Binder, K., Krauss, S., Schmidmaier, R., & Braun, L. T. (2021) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-020-10025-8 · Cited by 15
Interactive Visualization for Group Decision Analysis
Bajracharya, S., Carenini, G., Chamberlain, B., Chen, K., Klein, D., Poole, D., Taheri, H., & Öberg, G. (2018) · International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622018500384 · Cited by 15
Emery, J., Pirotta, M., Macrae, F., Walker, J., Qama, A., Boussioutas, A., & Jenkins, M. (2018) · Australian Journal of General Practice · doi:10.31128/ajgp-11-17-4386 · Cited by 15
Gram, E., Jønsson, A., Brodersen, J., & Damhus, C. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11091230 · Cited by 14
“Communicating the benefits and harms of medical screening is not an easy task [16,55].”
BackgroundDimensions of Uncertainty: A spatiotemporal review of five COVID-19 datasets
Halpern, D., Lin, Q.-Y., Wang, R., Yang, S., Goldstein, S., & Kolak, M. A. (2021) · Cartography and Geographic Information Science · doi:10.1080/15230406.2021.1975311 · Cited by 14
“This work also highlights the complexities of communicating uncertainty from incomplete or disputed knowledge, a core challenge when planning for uncertain futures (Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfographics Improve Comprehension and Recall at the Orthopaedic Journal Club.
Hughes, A., Mcquail, P., Keogh, P., & Synnott, K. (2020) · Journal of Surgical Education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.012 · Cited by 14
Weather Literacy in Times of Climate Change
Fleischhut, N., Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2020) · Weather Climate and Society · doi:10.1175/wcas-d-19-0043.1 · Cited by 27
“Yet despite concerns that probabilities can be difficult for laypeople to understand (Spiegelhalter et al. 2011), explanations of how they are to be interpreted are often lacking, insufficient, or even inconsistent within and across countries.”
BackgroundCastañeda, P. (2019) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.19.00746 · Cited by 14
Reani, M., Peek, N., & Jay, C. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.033 · Cited by 14
BOWMAN, A. W. (2019) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/rssa.12379 · Cited by 13
Monitoring Volatile Homicide Trends Across U.S. Cities
Wheeler, A. P., & Kovandzic, T. (2018) · Homicide Studies · doi:10.1177/1088767917740171 · Cited by 14
Milch, K. F., Broad, K., Orlove, B., & Meyer, R. J. (2018) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos9010032 · Cited by 20
“Further complicating storm preparation decisions is the challenge of visually communicating probabilistic storm information [34,35].”
BackgroundCanfield, C., de Bruin, W. B., & Wong‐Parodi, G. (2017) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1121909 · Cited by 14
Sachs, M. L., Sporrong, S. K., Colding‐Jørgensen, M., Frøkjær, S., Helboe, P., Jelic, K., & Kaae, S. S. (2017) · Pharmaceutical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40290-017-0200-z · Cited by 15
Telecoupling visualizations through a network lens: a systematic review
Sonderegger, G., Oberlack, C., Llopis, J. C., Verburg, P. H., & Heinimann, A. (2020) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-11830-250447 · Cited by 19
“This feature helps to address the needs of different users (Spiegelhalter et al. 2011).”
BackgroundA decision‐making experiment under wind power forecast uncertainty
Möhrlen, C., Bessa, R., & Fleischhut, N. (2022) · Meteorological Applications · doi:10.1002/met.2077 · Cited by 13
“, Joslyn & LeClerc, 2013), and how to best communicate uncertainty information transparently (Spiegelhalter et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPanzone, L., Garrod, G. D., Adinolfi, F., & Pasquale, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12489 · Cited by 14
Rosen, J., Agrawal, N., Flum, D., & Liao, J. M. (2021) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005255 · Cited by 13
Co-designing engaging and accessible data visualisations: a case study of the IPCC reports
Morelli, A., Johansen, T. G., Pidcock, R., Harold, J., Pirani, A., Gomis, M., Lorenzoni, I., Haughey, E., & Coventry, K. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03171-4 · Cited by 13
Becker, J., Potter, S., Mcbride, S. K., Doyle, E. E. H., Gerstenberger, M., & Christophersen, A. (2020) · Seismological Research Letters · doi:10.1785/0220190354 · Cited by 13
Hamilton, J. G., Garzon, M. G., Shah, I. H., Cadet, K., Shuk, E., Westerman, J. S., Hay, J. L., Offit, K., & Robson, M. E. (2020) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000505854 · Cited by 16
Salience Versus Proportional Reasoning: Rethinking the Mechanism Behind Graphical Display Effects
Stone, E. R., Reeder, E. C., Parillo, J., Long, C., & Walb, L. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2051 · Cited by 15
Hund, L., Schroeder, B., Rumsey, K. N., & Huerta, G. (2018) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.017 · Cited by 13
On the role of visualisation in fisheries management
Levontin, P., Baranowski, P., Leach, A., Bailey, A., Mumford, J., Quetglas, A., & Kell, L. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.018 · Cited by 13
“Innovation in the way information is communicated has 407 never been a more pressing need [1, 8, 18].”
BackgroundInfluentialRedshaw, M., & Harvey, M. (2016) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0561-6 · Cited by 13
“This suggests that consideration of other modes of communication, particularly visual graphical representation as a way of facilitating discussion and understanding could be worthwhile [22].”
BackgroundQuantifying and Communicating Uncertainty in Preclinical Human Dose‐Prediction
Sundqvist, M., Lundahl, A., Någård, M., Bredberg, U., & Gennemark, P. (2015) · CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.32 · Cited by 14
“Communication by visualization is central in science to convey causal relationships, temporal trends, data, etc.(27) Successful communication depends on several factors(28):”
BackgroundLatt, P., Soe, N. N., Fairley, C., Xu, X.-H., King, A. J., Rahman, R., Ong, J., Phillips, T., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2023-055978 · Cited by 12
“13 18 26 We found a strong association between perceived risk and the intent to have HIV/STI testing.”
BackgroundBrnic, M., Greefrath, G., & Reinhold, F. (2024) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-023-01543-x · Cited by 19
Tangible Web: An Interactive Immersion Virtual Reality Creativity System that Travels Across Reality
Yang, S., Gao, Z., Mogavi, R. H., Hui, P., & Braud, T. (2023) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3543507.3587432 · Cited by 12
“Interactive content promotes understanding by enabling users to actively explore information, which is more efective compared to traditional methods [18, 26, 27].”
BackgroundBrain networks under uncertainty: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of brain imaging studies.
Feng, S.-Q., Zhang, M., Peng, Y., Yang, S., Wang, Y.-F., Wu, X., & Zou, F. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.099 · Cited by 12
Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial
Recchia, G., Lawrence, A. C. E., & Freeman, A. (2021) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100003 · Cited by 12
“Icon arrays have been developed using techniques such as partially filled icons[19] and icons that fade from one color to another[20], but comprehension of such representations has not been broadly empirically tested.”
BackgroundGidlow, C. J., Ellis, N., Cowap, L., Riley, V., Crone, D., Cottrell, E., Grogan, S., Chambers, R. M., & Clark-Carter, D. D. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25500 · Cited by 19
Kelleher, C. A., & Braswell, A. (2021) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105113 · Cited by 30
McDowell, M., & Kause, A. (2021) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13739 · Cited by 12
The Mode Heuristic in Service Consumers’ Interpretations of Online Rating Distributions
Köcher, S., & Köcher, S. (2021) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705211012475 · Cited by 14
Effective Uncertainty Visualization for Aftershock Forecast Maps
Schneider, M., Mcdowell, M., Guttorp, P., Steel, E., & Fleischhut, N. (2021) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8318 · Cited by 12
“We focus on representing the distribution’s spread rather than probability of exceedance because there has been less research on this way of communicating forecast uncertainty (Spiegelhalter et al., 2011) and it is of general interest to other natural hazard forecasts as well.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCartograms for Use in Forecasting Weather-Driven Natural Hazards
Pappenberger, F., Cloke, H., & Baugh, C. (2019) · The Cartographic Journal · doi:10.1080/00087041.2018.1534358 · Cited by 12
“…are very complex with many variables and timescales to display, usually involving data from probabilistic and/or multi-model forecasts (Demeritt et al., 2010; Ramos et al., 2010; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011; Cloke et al., 2013; Rautenhaus et al., 2015; Davis et al., 2016; Quinan and Meyer, 2016).”
BackgroundGlynn, P. D., Voinov, A. A., Shapiro, C. D., & White, P. (2018) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1002/2018ef000819 · Cited by 13
“Even though we explicitly acknowledged the role of uncertainty, and brought in a number of references related to the topic (Brugnach et al., 2008; Kloprogge et al., 2007; Spiegelhalter et al., 2011; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974; Van der Sluijs et al., 2005), our paper emphasized other topics.”
BackgroundShefer, G., Silarova, B., Usher-Smith, J., & Griffin, S. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3867-2 · Cited by 12
“Many of the challenges of understanding and interpreting risk scores have been reported previously [47, 48].”
BackgroundFrom marginal to simultaneous prediction intervals of wind power
Bessa, R. (2015) · International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/isap.2015.7325536 · Cited by 12
“A general discussion about this topic can be found in [13] and [14].”
BackgroundFraming effects and risk perception: testing graphical representations of risk for the KIID
Stössel, R., & Meier, A. A. (2015) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2606615 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiegelhalter, D., Pearson, M., & Short, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Spiegelhalter, David
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2011-09-09
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 6048
- Pages
- 1393-1400
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2015011409
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- uncertainty communication, probability communication, infographics, interactive visualization, numeracy, lay audiences, future uncertainty, climate uncertainty, weather forecasting, health communication, economics communication, sport
- MeSH terms
- Computer Graphics, Data Display, Forecasting, Humans, Probability, Risk, Information Dissemination, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review