The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Content-Specific Fronto-Parietal Synchronization During Visual Working Memory
Open accessAbstract
Synchronous Brain Activity: Synchronization of neuronal activity across different brain areas varies according to working memory load or the locus of attention. It is thought that synchronization serves as a general mechanism for increasing effective cross-area communication during memory and attention tasks. However, it is not known if synchronization carries specific content. Salazar et al. (p. 1097 , published online 1 November) recorded from multiple electrodes across parietal and prefrontal cortices of monkeys and found content-specific synchronization for both location and object identity in a working memory task. The findings suggest that the contents of working memory could be maintained through site-specific synchrony across brain areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Funahashi, S., Bruce, C. J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1989.61.2.331 · Cited by 2,685
Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138071 · Cited by 2,380
The role of phase synchronization in memory processes
Fell, J., & Axmacher, N. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2979 · Cited by 1,620
Memory related motor planning activity in posterior parietal cortex of macaque
Gnadt, J. W., & Andersen, R. A. (1988) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00271862 · Cited by 998
Cited by
Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations
Hutchison, R. M., Womelsdorf, T., Allen, E. A., Bandettini, P. A., Calhoun, V. D., Corbetta, M., Della Penna, S., Duyn, J. H., Glover, G. H., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079 · Cited by 2,962
Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels
Bastos, A. M., Vezoli, J., Bosman, C. A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Oostenveld, R., Dowdall, J. R., De Weerd, P., Kennedy, H., & Fries, P. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.018 · Cited by 1,320
A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls
Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 · Cited by 1,313
Roux, F., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010 · Cited by 871
Anatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex
Markov, N. T., Vezoli, J., Chameau, P., Falchier, A., Quilodran, R., Huissoud, C., Lamy, C., Misery, P., Giroud, P., Ullman, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23458 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Salazar, R. F., Dotson, N. M., Bressler, S. L., & Gray, C. M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-11-23
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 6110
- Pages
- 1097-1100
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1967950674
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content-Specific Fronto-Parietal Synchronization During Visual Working Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1224000
- The paper
- Salazar, R. F., Dotson, N. M., Bressler, S. L., & Gray, C. M. (2012). Content-Specific Fronto-Parietal Synchronization During Visual Working Memory. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
