The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
Open accessAbstract
Social scientists should adopt higher transparency standards to improve the quality and credibility of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Self-citationWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033242 · Cited by 1,500
Self-citationNosek (2012) · doi:10.1177/1745691612459058 · Cited by 1,301
For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis
Rubin, D. B. (2008) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-aoas187 · Cited by 831
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
Stroebe, W., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460687 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Promoting an open research culture
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab2374 · Cited by 2,708
Self-citationVan Dam, N. T., van Vugt, M. K., Vago, D. R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C. D., Olendzki, A., Meissner, T., Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Gorchov, J., et al. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617709589 · Cited by 1,506
Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., et al. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918810225 · Cited by 944
Self-citationThe benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition
Bratman, G. N., Daily, G. C., Levy, B. J., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005 · Cited by 939
Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192 · Cited by 716
“The practices include: (Miguel et al., 2014) that are maintained by the Open Science Collaboration (https:// osf.io/tvyxz/).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies
van de Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Winter, S. D., Depaoli, S., & Vermunt, J. K. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646 · Cited by 721
Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L.-S., Kennett, C., Slowik, A., Sonnleitner, C., Hess-Holden, C., et al. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456 · Cited by 700
Self-citationSimonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z · Cited by 651
Self-citationNelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 · Cited by 548
Self-citationPatil, S. R., Arnold, B. F., Salvatore, A. L., Briceno, B., Ganguly, S., Colford, J. M., & Gertler, P. J. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001709 · Cited by 487
Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back
Brodeur, A., Lé, M., Sangnier, M., & Zylberberg, Y. (2016) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20150044 · Cited by 430
A primer on investigating the after effects of acute bouts of physical activity on cognition
Pontifex, M. B., McGowan, A. L., Chandler, M. C., Gwizdala, K. L., Parks, A. C., Fenn, K., & Kamijo, K. (2019) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.015 · Cited by 339
Methods Matter: p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics
Brodeur, A., Cook, N., & Heyes, A. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190687 · Cited by 333
Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
Dreber, A., Pfeiffer, T., Almenberg, J., Isaksson, S., Wilson, B., Chen, Y., Nosek, B. A., & Johannesson, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1516179112 · Cited by 331
Self-citationAn open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
Errington, T. M., Iorns, E., Gunn, W., Tan, F. E., Lomax, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04333 · Cited by 312
Self-citationBlind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth
MacCoun, R., & Perlmutter, S. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/526187a · Cited by 218
Hardwicke, T. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., Bendixen, T., Crüwell, S., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.190806 · Cited by 217
Hardwicke, T. E., Thibault, R. T., Kosie, J. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620979806 · Cited by 187
Marwick, B. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9 · Cited by 179
Pre-Analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible
Coffman, L. C., & Niederle, M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.81 · Cited by 156
Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review
Lee, H., Lamb, S. E., Bagg, M. K., Toomey, E., Cashin, A. G., & Moseley, G. L. (2018) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001254 · Cited by 150
Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review
Scholten, H., Scheres, A., de Water, E., Graf, U., Granic, I., & Luijten, M. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01629-2 · Cited by 135
Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research
Hardwicke, T. E., Serghiou, S., Janiaud, P., Danchev, V., Crüwell, S., Goodman, S. N., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-031219-041104 · Cited by 98
Standard Operating Procedures: A Safety Net for Pre-Analysis Plans
Lin, W., & Green, D. P. (2016) · Political Science and Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096516000810 · Cited by 71
Self-citationOlazabal, M., Neumann, M. B., Foudi, S., & Chiabai, A. (2018) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2519 · Cited by 56
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpv006 · Cited by 44
Analytic Review as a Solution to the Misreporting of Statistical Results in Psychological Science
Sakaluk, J., Williams, A., & Biernat, M. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614549257 · Cited by 32
Pickering, A. J., Arnold, B. F., Dentz, H. N., Colford, J. M., & Null, C. (2017) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp342 · Cited by 29
Marwick, B., Barton, C. M., Bates, L., Bollwerk, E., Bocinsky, R. K., Carter, A. K., Conrad, C., Costa, S., Crema, E. R., Davies, B., et al. (2017) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/72n8g · Cited by 17
Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a responsible data science workflow
Stoudt, S., Jernite, Y., Marshall, B., Marwick, B., Sharan, M., Whitaker, K., & Danchev, V. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012232 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Miguel, E., Camerer, C., Casey, K., Cohen, J., Esterling, K. M., Gerber, A., Glennerster, R., Green, D. P., Humphreys, M., Imbens, G., Laitin, D., Madon, T., Nelson, L., Nosek, B. A., Petersen, M., Sedlmayr, R., Simmons, J. P., Simonsohn, U., & Van der Laan, M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2014-01-03
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 6166
- Pages
- 30-31
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2113788769
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 124.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
