Cited by 613Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMarine and fisheries research

Climate change and wind intensification in coastal upwelling ecosystems

Sydeman, W. J., García-Reyes, M., Schoeman, D. S., Rykaczewski, R. R., Thompson, S. A., Black, B. A., Bograd, S. J.·2014·Science

Abstract

In 1990, Andrew Bakun proposed that increasing greenhouse gas concentrations would force intensification of upwelling-favorable winds in eastern boundary current systems that contribute substantial services to society. Because there is considerable disagreement about whether contemporary wind trends support Bakun's hypothesis, we performed a meta-analysis of the literature on upwelling-favorable wind intensification. The preponderance of published analyses suggests that winds have intensified in the California, Benguela, and Humboldt upwelling systems and weakened in the Iberian system over time scales ranging up to 60 years; wind change is equivocal in the Canary system. Stronger intensification signals are observed at higher latitudes, consistent with the warming pattern associated with climate change. Overall, reported changes in coastal winds, although subtle and spatially variable, support Bakun's hypothesis of upwelling intensification in eastern boundary current systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1251635

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sydeman, W. J., García-Reyes, M., Schoeman, D. S., Rykaczewski, R. R., Thompson, S. A., Black, B. A., & Bograd, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Farallon Institute (US)
  • Farallon Institute for Advanced Ecosystem Research, Suite Q, 101 H Street, Petaluma, CA 94952, USA.
  • University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Sydeman, W. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2014-07-04
Volume
345
Issue
6192
Pages
77-80
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2143385076
Cited by
613
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 6
FWCI
32.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
climate change, coastal upwelling, eastern boundary currents, upwelling-favorable winds, greenhouse gas forcing, California Current, Benguela Current, Humboldt Current, Canary Current, wind trends, ocean warming
MeSH terms
California, Wind, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review