The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ecological Context of Life History Evolution
Abstract
There is now a good theoretical understanding of life history evolution, and detailed explicit optimality models have been constructed. These present a challenge for empirical work examining some of the assumptions, such as the extent and mechanisms of the costs of growth and reproduction. In addition, there is an obvious need for comparative tests of the models. These tests, properly applied, may be particularly informative because they can deal with multiple independent variables, including ecological variables, and can reveal broad trends against a background of constraints on optima and the rate of evolutionary approach to them. Life histories are the probabilities of survival and the rates of reproduction at each age in the life-span. Reproduction is costly, so that fertility at all ages cannot simultaneously be maximized by natural selection. Allocation of reproductive effort has evolved in response to the demographic impact of different environments but is constrained by genetic variance and evolutionary history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Size and Cycle: An Essay on the Structure of Biology
Bonner, J. T. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400874750 · Cited by 325
Cited by
Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: Contemporary Extensions Built Upon Ancient Foundations
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369469 · Cited by 1,132
Optimally, mutation and the evolution of ageing
Partridge, L., & Barton, N. H. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362305a0 · Cited by 668
Self-citationA cost of mating in female fruitflies
Fowler, K., & Partridge, L. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338760a0 · Cited by 570
Self-citationCosts of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals
(1992) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0030 · Cited by 342
CLUTCH SIZE AND EGG SIZE IN FREE-LIVING AND PARASITIC COPEPODS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Poulin, R. (1995) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02245.x · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Partridge, L., & Harvey, P. H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1988-09-16
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 4872
- Pages
- 1449-1455
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1974377563
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 36.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ecological Context of Life History Evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.241.4872.1449
- The paper
- Partridge, L., & Harvey, P. H. (1988). The Ecological Context of Life History Evolution. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4872.1449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.