CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,197Language Development and DisordersHearing Loss and RehabilitationReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech

Tallal, Paula, Miller, Steve L., Bedi, Gail, Byma, Gary, Wang, Xiaoqin, Nagarajan, Srikantan S., Schreiner, Christoph, Jenkins, William M., Merzenich, Michael M.·1996·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.271.5245.81
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A speech processing algorithm was developed to create more salient versions of the rapidly changing elements in the acoustic waveform of speech that have been shown to be deficiently processed by language-learning impaired (LLI) children. LLI children received extensive daily training, over a 4-week period, with listening exercises in which all speech was translated into this synthetic form. They also received daily training with computer “games” designed to adaptively drive improvements in temporal processing thresholds. Significant improvements in speech discrimination and language comprehension abilities were demonstrated in two independent groups of LLI children.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.271.5245.81

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. CURTISS S, UNPUB CURTISS YAMADA .
  2. DISIMONI F, TOKEN TEST CHILDREN (1978).
  3. EIMAS D. P., CATEGORICAL PERCEPTI: 161 (1987).
  4. GOLDMAN R, GOLDMAN FRISTOE TEST (1986).
  5. GOLDMAN R, GOLDMAN FRISTOE WOOD (1974).
  6. HENDERSON L. J., 61ST BIENN M SOC RES (1995).
  7. LANGHANS T, 1982 P IEEE INT C AC: 156 (1982).
  8. MERZENICH M. M., MATURATIONAL WINDOWS: 247 (1995).
  9. RISSMAN M, J SPEECH LANGUAGE PA 14, 49 (1990).
  10. STARK R, LANGUAGE SPEECH READ (1988).
  11. TALLAL P, NONSPEECH LANGUAGE C: 449 (1980).
  12. TALLAL P, UNPUB COMPUTERIZED V (1994).
  13. WILLIAMS M. D., J OTOLARYNGOL S 7, 5 (1980).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., Schreiner, C., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Tallal, Paula
ORCID
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
1996-01-05
Volume
271
Issue
5245
Pages
81-84
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.271.5245.81
OpenAlex
W2016434864
Cited by
1,197
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 34
FWCI
127.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002260)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS010414)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
language comprehension, speech processing algorithms, temporal processing, speech discrimination, auditory training, video games
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Disorders, Language Therapy, Learning Disabilities, Male, Software, Speech Perception, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review