Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,137

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measurement of Parity Nonconservation and an Anapole Moment in Cesium

Wood, C. S., Bennett, S. C., Cho, D., Masterson, B. P., Roberts, J. L., Tanner, C. E., Wieman, C. E.·1997·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.275.5307.1759
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The amplitude of the parity-nonconserving transition between the 6 S and 7 S states of cesium was precisely measured with the use of a spin-polarized atomic beam. This measurement gives Im(E1 pnc )/β = −1.5935(56) millivolts per centimeter and provides an improved test of the standard model at low energy, including a value for the S parameter of −1.3(3) exp (11) theory . The nuclear spin-dependent contribution was 0.077(11) millivolts per centimeter; this contribution is a manifestation of parity violation in atomic nuclei and is a measurement of the long-sought anapole moment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.275.5307.1759

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bouchiat M. A. Bouchiat C. J. Phys. (Paris) 35 899 (1974); ibid. 36 493 (1975). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Langacker P. Luo M. Mann A. K. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 87 (1992); · DOI
  3. Rosner J., Phys. Rev. D 53, 2724 (1995). · doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.2724
  4. Z mass LEP Collaboration Phys. Lett. B 307 187 (1993). · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90210-9
  5. Zel'Dovich Ya. B., Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 1184 (1958).
  6. Flambaum V. V. Khriplovich I. B. ibid. 52 835 (1980); · doi:10.1002/cite.330521016
  7. ___ and Sushkov O. P., Phys. Lett. B 146, 367 (1984); · DOI
  8. Haxton W. C. , Henley E. M. , Musolf M. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 949 (1989); · DOI
  9. Bouchiatand C. , Piketty C. A., Z. Phys. C 49, 91 (1991); · DOI
  10. Dmitriev V. F. , Khriplovich I. B. , Telitsin V. B., Nucl. Phys. A 577, 691 (1994); · DOI
  11. Bouchiat C. and , Piketty C. A., Phys. Lett. B 269, 195 (1991); · DOI
  12. Kozlov M. G., Phys. Lett. A 130, 426 (1988). · DOI
  13. Gilbert S. L. Noecker M. C. Watts R. N. Wieman C. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 2680 (1985); · DOI
  14. Gilbert S. L. and , Wieman C. E., Phys. Rev. A 34, 792 (1986). · doi:10.1103/physreva.34.792
  15. Masterson B. P., Tanner C., Patrick H., Wieman C. E., Phys. Rev. A 47, 2139 (1993). · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.2139
  16. Wieman C. E., et al., Frontiers in Laser Spectroscopy, , Hansch T., Inguscio M., Eds. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994);
  17. Drever R. W. P., et al., Appl. Phys. B 31, 97 (1983). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Wieman C. E., Hollberg L., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 1 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  19. We have done extensive tests to determine that the average error in the determination of the polarization was much less than 1 × 10 −3 . See J. L. Roberts et al. University of Colorado preprint and (26).
  20. Bouchiat M. A., Coblentz A., Guena J., Pottier L., J. Phys. (Paris) 42, 985 (1981). · doi:10.1051/jphys:01981004207098500
  21. Wieman C. E. Noecker M. C. Masterson B. P. Cooper J. Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 58 1738 (1987). The details of the related PNC systematic are slightly different in this case because of the optically pumped beam and higher laser powers. · DOI
  22. Kraftmakher Ya. Phys. Lett. A 132 167 (1988); · DOI
  23. Frantsusov P. A. and , Khriplovich I. B., Z. Phys. D 7, 297 (1988). · DOI
  24. Dzuba V. A., Flambaum V. V., Sushkov O. P., Phys. Lett. A 141, 147 (1989). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Marciano W., Rosner J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2963 (1990). · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.2963
  26. Mahanthapa K. T., Mohapatra P. K., Phys. Rev. D 43, 3093 (1991). · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3093
  27. Sapirstein J., Atomic Physics 14: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Atomic Physics, , Wineland D., Wieman C., Smith S., Eds. (AIP Press, New York, 1995).
  28. Bouchiat M. A., et al., J. Phys. (Paris) 47, 1709 (1986). · DOI
  29. Cho D., Wood C. S., Bennett S. C., Roberts J. L., Wieman C. E., Phys. Rev. A 55, 1007 (1997). · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,137

Metadata

Authors
Wood, C. S., Bennett, S. C., Cho, D., Masterson, B. P., Roberts, J. L., Tanner, C. E., & Wieman, C. E.
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
1997-03-21
Volume
275
Issue
5307
Pages
1759-1763
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.275.5307.1759
OpenAlex
W2004761211
Cited by
1,137
References
1
FWCI
40.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Parity Nonconservation and an Anapole Moment in Cesium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.275.5307.1759
The paper
Wood, C. S., Bennett, S. C., Cho, D., Masterson, B. P., Roberts, J. L., Tanner, C. E., & Wieman, C. E. (1997). Measurement of Parity Nonconservation and an Anapole Moment in Cesium. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5307.1759

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.