Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 544

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Programmed necrosis in inflammation: Toward identification of the effector molecules

Wallach, David, Kang, Tae-Bong, Dillon, Christopher P., Green, Douglas R.·2016·Science

Abstract

Apoptosis, necrosis, and pyroptosis: The routes to cell death are many, and distinguishing which path a particular cell may have taken remains a challenge. Wallach et al. review current understanding of how programmed necrotic cell death contributes to inflammation. Science , this issue p. 10.1126/science.aaf2154

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaf2154

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 544

Metadata

Authors
Wallach, D., Kang, T.-B., Dillon, C. P., & Green, D. R.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-04
Volume
352
Issue
6281
Pages
aaf2154-aaf2154
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2319054200
Cited by
544
References
70
FWCI
28.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programmed necrosis in inflammation: Toward identification of the effector molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aaf2154
The paper
Wallach, D., Kang, T.-B., Dillon, C. P., & Green, D. R. (2016). Programmed necrosis in inflammation: Toward identification of the effector molecules. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2154

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.