Cited by 135Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurological disorders and treatments

Deconstructing behavioral neuropharmacology with cellular specificity

Shields, Brenda C., Kahuno, Elizabeth, Kim, Charles, Apostolides, Pierre F., Brown, Jennifer, Lindo, Sarah, Mensh, Brett D., Dudman, Joshua T. +2 more·2017·Science

Abstract

Behavior has molecular, cellular, and circuit determinants. However, because many proteins are broadly expressed, their acute manipulation within defined cells has been difficult. Here, we combined the speed and molecular specificity of pharmacology with the cell type specificity of genetic tools. DART (drugs acutely restricted by tethering) is a technique that rapidly localizes drugs to the surface of defined cells, without prior modification of the native target. We first developed an AMPAR antagonist DART, with validation in cultured neuronal assays, in slices of mouse dorsal striatum, and in behaving mice. In parkinsonian animals, motor deficits were causally attributed to AMPARs in indirect spiny projection neurons (iSPNs) and to excess phasic firing of tonically active interneurons (TANs). Together, iSPNs and TANs (i.e., D2 cells) drove akinesia, whereas movement execution deficits reflected the ratio of AMPARs in D2 versus D1 cells. Finally, we designed a muscarinic antagonist DART in one iteration, demonstrating applicability of the method to diverse targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaj2161

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This produces an approximately 100-fold enrichment of the drug on the surface of HaloTag-expressing cells.

    “A protein called HaloTag is expressed in defined neuronal cells (e.g. using a cell-type-specific promoter) and captures and tethers drugs to the cell surface over seconds to minutes, producing an approximately 100-fold enrichment of the drug on the surface of the HaloTag-expressing cells.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [143]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shields, B. C., Kahuno, E., Kim, C., Apostolides, P. F., Brown, J., Lindo, S., Mensh, B. D., Dudman, J. T., Lavis, L. D., & Tadross, M. R.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shields, Brenda C.
  • Kahuno, Elizabeth
  • Kim, Charles
  • Apostolides, Pierre F.
  • Tadross, Michael R.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-04-07
Volume
356
Issue
6333
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2604969293
Cited by
135
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (award300683)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
DART, AMPA receptor antagonism, antimuscarinic agents, dorsal striatum, dopamine D2 receptor, dopamine D1 receptor, parkinsonism, akinesia, motor impairment, striatal circuitry
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corpus Striatum, Disease Models, Animal, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Quinoxalines, Drug Design, Receptors, Glutamate, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Muscarinic Antagonists, Mice, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review