The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language
Open accessAbstract
Clear directions for a robotic platform: The chemistry literature contains more than a century's worth of instructions for making molecules, all written by and for humans. Steiner et al. developed an autonomous compiler and robotic laboratory platform to synthesize organic compounds on the basis of standardized methods descriptions (see the Perspective by Milo). The platform comprises conventional equipment such as round-bottom flasks, separatory funnels, and a rotary evaporator to maximize its compatibility with extant literature. The authors showcase the system with short syntheses of three common pharmaceuticals that proceeded comparably to manual synthesis. Science , this issue p. eaav2211 ; see also p. 122
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
Baker, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/533452a · Cited by 4,209
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., & Seeberger, P. H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183 · Cited by 1,995
Brown, D. G., & Boström, J. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01409 · Cited by 1,964
On-demand continuous-flow production of pharmaceuticals in a compact, reconfigurable system
Adamo, A., Beingessner, R. L., Behnam, M., Chen, J., Jamison, T. F., Jensen, K. F., Monbaliu, J.-C. M., Myerson, A. S., Revalor, E. M., Snead, D. R., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1337 · Cited by 941
Automated Solid-Phase Synthesis of Oligosaccharides
Plante, O. J., Palmacci, E. R., & Seeberger, P. H. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057324 · Cited by 933
Merrifield, R. B. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3693.178 · Cited by 540
Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process
Li, J., Ballmer, S. G., Gillis, E. P., Fujii, S., Schmidt, M. J., Palazzolo, A. M. E., Lehmann, J. W., Morehouse, G. F., & Burke, M. D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa5414 · Cited by 539
Reconfigurable system for automated optimization of diverse chemical reactions
Bédard, A.-C., Adamo, A., Aroh, K. C., Russell, M. G., Bedermann, A. A., Torosian, J., Yue, B., Jensen, K. F., & Jamison, T. F. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat0650 · Cited by 482
Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry
Häse, F., Roch, L. M., Kreisbeck, C., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00307 · Cited by 379
Pathway Databases: A Case Study in Computational Symbolic Theories
Karp, P. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064621 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179 · Cited by 1,726
Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development
Paul, D., Sanap, G., Shenoy, S., Kalyane, D., Kalia, K., & Tekade, R. K. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010 · Cited by 1,695
Burger, B., Maffettone, P. M., Gusev, V. V., Aitchison, C. M., Bai, Y., Wang, X., Li, X., Alston, B. M., Li, B., Clowes, R., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2 · Cited by 1,516
A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by AI planning
Coley, C. W., Thomas, D. A., Lummiss, J. A. M., Jaworski, J. N., Breen, C. P., Schultz, V., Hart, T., Fishman, J. S., Rogers, L., Gao, H., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax1566 · Cited by 1,052
Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era
Schneider, P., Walters, W. P., Plowright, A. T., Sieroka, N., Listgarten, J., Goodnow, R. A., Fisher, J., Jansen, J. M., Duca, J. S., Rush, T. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0050-3 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Steiner, S., Wolf, J., Glatzel, S., Andreou, A., Granda, J. M., Keenan, G., Hinkley, T., Aragon-Camarasa, G., Kitson, P. J., Angelone, D., & Cronin, L.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2019-01-11
- Volume
- 363
- Issue
- 6423
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2902762889
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aav2211
- The paper
- Steiner, S., Wolf, J., Glatzel, S., Andreou, A., Granda, J. M., Keenan, G., Hinkley, T., Aragon-Camarasa, G., Kitson, P. J., Angelone, D., & Cronin, L. (2019). Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.