CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 644

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Julich-Brain: A 3D probabilistic atlas of the human brain’s cytoarchitecture

Amunts, Katrin, Mohlberg, Hartmut, Bludau, Sebastian, Zilles, Karl·2020·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.abb4588
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A present-day atlas of the human brain: Defining brain regions and demarking their spatial extent are important goals in neuroscience. A modern map of the brain's cellular structure, a cytoarchitectonic atlas, should provide maps of areas in three dimensions, integrate recent knowledge about brain parcellation, consider variations between individual brains, rely on reproducible workflows, and provide web-based links to other resources and databases. Amunts et al. created such an atlas based on serial histological sections of brain. They developed a computational framework and refined the current boundaries of the human brain based on cytoarchitectural patterns. This technique can easily be transferred to build brain atlases for other species or a spatial framework for other organs, other modalities, or multimodal maps for regions of interest at higher spatial scales. This research makes similar future attempts simultaneously reproducible and flexible. Science , this issue p. 988

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abb4588

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.003 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.003 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.036 · DOI
  5. R. Nieuwenhuys, C. A. J. Broere, A map of the human neocortex showing the estimated overall myelin content of the individual architectonic areas based on the studies of Adolf Hopf. Brain Struct. Funct. 222, 465–480 (2016). doi: · DOI
  6. J. K. Mai et al . Atlas of the Human Brain (Academic Press ed. 4 2015).
  7. 10.1038/nrn2776 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.024 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4753-06.2007 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1235381 · DOI
  11. H. Mohlberg et al . in Brain-Inspired Computing: Second International Workshop BrainComp 2015 K. Amunts et al. Eds. (Springer 2016) pp. 15–27.
  12. H. Damasio Human Brain Anatomy in Computerized Images (Oxford Univ. Press ed. 2 2005). · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s00429-005-0028-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/brain/awx004 · DOI
  16. H. Spitzer et al . in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2018 Part III A. F. Frangi et al . Eds. (Springer 2018) pp. 663–671. · DOI
  17. S. Bludau ., Integration of transcriptomic and cytoarchitectonic data implicates a role for MAOA and TAC1 in the limbic-cortical network. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 2335–2342 (2018). doi: · DOI
  18. M. Gibb et al . in International Conference on Computational Methods in Systems Biology D. Gilbert M. Heiner Eds. (Springer 2012) pp. 2–16. · DOI
  19. 10.1002/ase.1529 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00316652 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/sdata.2018.105 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. M. Ono et al . Atlas of the Cerbral Sulci (Thieme ed. 1 1990).
  24. C. von Economo G. N. Koskinas Die Cytoarchitektonik der Hirnrinde des erwachsenen Menschen (Springer 1925).
  25. 10.1038/ncomms4122 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.003 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/sdata.2018.105 · DOI
  28. 10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/nla.477 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.gmod.2004.05.001 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004426 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.039 · DOI
  33. 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.media.2011.02.008 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.083 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s11682-013-9255-y · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.076 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.033 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.003 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.003 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.186 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.future.2010.07.005 · DOI
  43. 10.3389/fninf.2016.00026 · DOI
  44. R. McClatchey Data Provenance Tracking as the Basis for a Biomedical Virtual Research Environment (2018); https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1803/1803.07433.pdf.
  45. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.09.011 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.004 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.053 · DOI
  48. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0715 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.02.021 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.060 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Amunts, K., Mohlberg, H., Bludau, S., & Zilles, K.
Affiliations
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
ORCID
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2020-08-21
Volume
369
Issue
6506
Pages
988-992
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.abb4588
Cited by
644
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review