Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies

Open access
Wec, Anna Z., Wrapp, Daniel, Herbert, Andrew S., Maurer, Daniel P., Haslwanter, Denise, Sakharkar, Mrunal, Jangra, Rohit K., Dieterle, M. Eugenia, Lilov, Asparouh, Huang, Deli, Tse, Longping V., Johnson, Nicole V., Hsieh, Ching-Lin, Wang, Nianshuang, Nett, Juergen H., Champney, Elizabeth, Burnina, Irina, Brown, Michael, Lin, Shu, Sinclair, Melanie, Johnson, Carl, Pudi, Sarat, Bortz, Robert, Wirchnianski, Ariel S., Laudermilch, Ethan, Florez, Catalina, Fels, J. Maximilian, O’Brien, Cecilia M., Graham, Barney S., Nemazee, David, Burton, Dennis R., Baric, Ralph S., Voss, James E., Chandran, Kartik, Dye, John M., McLellan, Jason S., Walker, Laura M.·2020·Science

Abstract

Seeking broad protection: As scientists develop therapeutic antibodies and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the risk of emergent coronaviruses makes it important to also identify broadly protective antibodies. Wec et al. isolated and characterized hundreds of antibodies against the viral spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 from the memory B cells of a survivor of the 2003 outbreak caused by the related coronavirus, SARS-CoV. In both of these viruses, the spike protein facilitated viral entry by binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on human cells. The antibodies targeted multiple sites on the spike protein, but of nine antibodies that showed strong cross-neutralization, eight targeted the domain that binds to ACE2. These eight antibodies also neutralized a bat SARS-related virus. Illuminating the epitopes on the viral spike protein that bind cross-neutralizing antibodies could guide the design of broadly protective vaccines. Science , this issue p. 731

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abc7424

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Wec, A. Z., Wrapp, D., Herbert, A. S., Maurer, D. P., Haslwanter, D., Sakharkar, M., Jangra, R. K., Dieterle, M. E., Lilov, A., Huang, D., Tse, L. V., Johnson, N. V., Hsieh, C.-L., Wang, N., Nett, J. H., Champney, E., Burnina, I., Brown, M., Lin, S., Sinclair, M., Johnson, C., Pudi, S., Bortz, R., Wirchnianski, A. S., Laudermilch, E., Florez, C., Fels, J. M., O’Brien, C. M., Graham, B. S., Nemazee, D., Burton, D. R., Baric, R. S., Voss, J. E., Chandran, K., Dye, J. M., McLellan, J. S., & Walker, L. M.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
369
Issue
6504
Pages
731-736
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3034816694
Cited by
539
References
13
FWCI
14.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.abc7424
The paper
Wec, A. Z., Wrapp, D., Herbert, A. S., Maurer, D. P., Haslwanter, D., Sakharkar, M., Jangra, R. K., Dieterle, M. E., Lilov, A., Huang, D., Tse, L. V., Johnson, N. V., Hsieh, C.-L., Wang, N., Nett, J. H., Champney, E., Burnina, I., Brown, M., Lin, S., . . . Walker, L. M. (2020). Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc7424

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.