Cited by 368Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactSexual Differentiation and Disorders

From cohorts to molecules: adverse impacts of endocrine disrupting mixtures

Open access
Caporale, Nicolò, Leemans, Michelle, Birgersson, Lina, Germain, Pierre-Luc, Cheroni, Cristina, Borbély, Gábor, Engdahl, Elin, Lindh, Christian +29 more·2022·Science

Abstract

Convergent evidence associates exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with major human diseases, even at regulation-compliant concentrations. This might be because humans are exposed to EDC mixtures, whereas chemical regulation is based on a risk assessment of individual compounds. Here, we developed a mixture-centered risk assessment strategy that integrates epidemiological and experimental evidence. We identified that exposure to an EDC mixture in early pregnancy is associated with language delay in offspring. At human-relevant concentrations, this mixture disrupted hormone-regulated and disease-relevant regulatory networks in human brain organoids and in the model organisms Xenopus leavis and Danio rerio , as well as behavioral responses. Reinterrogating epidemiological data, we found that up to 54% of the children had prenatal exposures above experimentally derived levels of concern, reaching, for the upper decile compared with the lowest decile of exposure, a 3.3 times higher risk of language delay.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abe8244

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Caporale et al. (2022) study found that approximately half of the women were exposed to levels of chemicals that could compromise neurodevelopment in their child.

    “The study found that approximately half of the women were exposed to levels of chemicals that could compromise neurodevelopment in their child.”

    From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Caporale et al., 2022

    The available indexed passages are repository metadata, including a project listing under the label “Abstract,” rather than the paper’s findings. Searches for the claimed approximately half of women and for a 50% chemical-mixture exposure associated with child neurodevelopment found no passage addressing the estimate. The claim cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Caporale et al. study does not tell what levels of chemicals the developing fetal brains were actually exposed to because the exposure was estimated from levels of chemicals in maternal blood.

    “However, the study does not tell what levels of chemicals the developing fetal brains were actually exposed to because the exposure was estimated from levels of chemicals in maternal blood.”

    From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Caporale et al., 2022

    The indexed copy contains an IRIS repository record rather than passages describing the study’s exposure measurements; the “01 - Articolo su periodico” section lists a PDF but provides no methods or results (no page number). Searches for maternal-blood measurements and fetal-brain chemical concentrations found no passage establishing whether the study measured either, so the claim cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caporale, N., Leemans, M., Birgersson, L., Germain, P.-L., Cheroni, C., Borbély, G., Engdahl, E., Lindh, C., Bressan, R. B., Cavallo, F., Chorev, N. E., D’Agostino, G. A., Pollard, S. M., Rigoli, M. T., Tenderini, E., Tobon, A. L., Trattaro, S., Troglio, F., Zanella, M., Bergman, Å., Damdimopoulou, P., Jönsson, M., Kiess, W., Kitraki, E., Kiviranta, H., Nånberg, E., Öberg, M., Rantakokko, P., Rudén, C., Söder, O., Bornehag, C.-G., Demeneix, B., Fini, J.-B., Gennings, C., Rüegg, J., Sturve, J., & Testa, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
  • Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center (SWETOX), Södertälje, Sweden.
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • Lab of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 152 72 Athens, Greece.
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karlstad University (SE)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
  • Caporale, Nicolò
  • Leemans, Michelle
  • Birgersson, Lina
  • Germain, Pierre-Luc
  • Cheroni, Cristina
  • Borbély, Gábor
  • Engdahl, Elin
  • D’Agostino, Giuseppe Alessandro
  • Zanella, Matteo
  • Bergman, Åke
  • Damdimopoulou, Pauliina
  • Öberg, Mattias
  • Bornehag, Carl-Gustaf
  • Demeneix, Barbara
  • Fini, Jean-Baptiste
  • Gennings, Chris
  • Rüegg, Joëlle
  • Sturve, Joachim
  • Testa, Giuseppe
Venue
Science
Published
2022-02-18
Volume
375
Issue
6582
Pages
eabe8244-eabe8244
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4220765784
Cited by
368
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
27.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (DRCNPG-Nov21\100002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
endocrine disruptors, chemical mixtures, mixture risk assessment, prenatal exposure, language delay, brain organoids, Xenopus laevis, zebrafish, behavioral responses
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Animals, Brain, Child, Preschool, Estrogens, Female, Fluorocarbons, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Locomotion, Organoids, Phenols, Phthalic Acids, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Thyroid Hormones, Xenopus laevis, Zebrafish, Risk Assessment, Gene Expression Profiling, Endocrine Disruptors, Neural Stem Cells, Transcriptome, Gene Ontology, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review