Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The genetic and epigenetic landscape of the Arabidopsis centromeres

Open access
Naish, Matthew, Alonge, Michael, Wlodzimierz, Piotr, Tock, Andrew J., Abramson, Bradley W., Schmücker, Anna, Mandáková, Terezie, Jamge, Bhagyshree, Lambing, Christophe, Kuo, Pallas, Yelina, Natasha, Hartwick, Nolan, Colt, Kelly, Smith, Lisa M., Ton, Jurriaan, Kakutani, Tetsuji, Martienssen, Robert A., Schneeberger, Korbinian, Lysak, Martin A., Berger, Frédéric, Bousios, Alexandros, Michael, Todd P., Schatz, Michael C., Henderson, Ian R.·2021·Science

Abstract

A closer look at centromeres: Centromeres are key for anchoring chromosomes to the mitotic spindle, but they have been difficult to sequence because they can contain many repeating DNA elements. These repeats, however, carry regularly spaced, distinctive sequence markers because of sequence heterogeneity between the mostly, but not completely, identical DNA sequence repeats. Such differences aid sequence assembly. Naish et al . used ultra-long-read DNA sequencing to establish a reference assembly that resolves all five centromeres in the small mustard plant Arabidopsis . Their view into the subtly homogenized world of centromeres reveals retrotransposons that interrupt centromere organization and repressive DNA methylation that excludes centromeres from meiotic crossover repair. Thus, Arabidopsis centromeres evolve under the opposing forces of sequence homogenization and retrotransposon disruption. —PJH

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abi7489

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Naish, M., Alonge, M., Wlodzimierz, P., Tock, A. J., Abramson, B. W., Schmücker, A., Mandáková, T., Jamge, B., Lambing, C., Kuo, P., Yelina, N., Hartwick, N., Colt, K., Smith, L. M., Ton, J., Kakutani, T., Martienssen, R. A., Schneeberger, K., Lysak, M. A., Berger, F., Bousios, A., Michael, T. P., Schatz, M. C., & Henderson, I. R.
Venue
Science
Published
2021-11-12
Volume
374
Issue
6569
Pages
eabi7489-eabi7489
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3213182660
Cited by
458
References
102
FWCI
41.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genetic and epigenetic landscape of the Arabidopsis centromeres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.abi7489
The paper
Naish, M., Alonge, M., Wlodzimierz, P., Tock, A. J., Abramson, B. W., Schmücker, A., Mandáková, T., Jamge, B., Lambing, C., Kuo, P., Yelina, N., Hartwick, N., Colt, K., Smith, L. M., Ton, J., Kakutani, T., Martienssen, R. A., Schneeberger, K., Lysak, M. A., . . . Henderson, I. R. (2021). The genetic and epigenetic landscape of the Arabidopsis centromeres. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi7489

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.