Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans

Open access
Domínguez Conde, C., Xu, C., Jarvis, L. B., Rainbow, D. B., Wells, S. B., Gomes, T., Howlett, S. K., Suchanek, O., Polanski, K., King, H. W., Mamanova, L., Huang, N., Szabo, P. A., Richardson, L., Bolt, L., Fasouli, E. S., Mahbubani, K. T., Prete, M., Tuck, L., Richoz, N., Tuong, Z. K., Campos, L., Mousa, H. S., Needham, E. J., Pritchard, S., Li, T., Elmentaite, R., Park, J., Rahmani, E., Chen, D., Menon, D. K., Bayraktar, O. A., James, L. K., Meyer, K. B., Yosef, N., Clatworthy, M. R., Sims, P. A., Farber, D. L., Saeb-Parsy, K., Jones, J. L., Teichmann, S. A.·2022·Science

Abstract

Despite their crucial role in health and disease, our knowledge of immune cells within human tissues remains limited. We surveyed the immune compartment of 16 tissues from 12 adult donors by single-cell RNA sequencing and VDJ sequencing generating a dataset of ~360,000 cells. To systematically resolve immune cell heterogeneity across tissues, we developed CellTypist, a machine learning tool for rapid and precise cell type annotation. Using this approach, combined with detailed curation, we determined the tissue distribution of finely phenotyped immune cell types, revealing hitherto unappreciated tissue-specific features and clonal architecture of T and B cells. Our multitissue approach lays the foundation for identifying highly resolved immune cell types by leveraging a common reference dataset, tissue-integrated expression analysis, and antigen receptor sequencing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abl5197

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Cited by

See all 1,159

Metadata

Authors
Domínguez Conde, C., Xu, C., Jarvis, L. B., Rainbow, D. B., Wells, S. B., Gomes, T., Howlett, S. K., Suchanek, O., Polanski, K., King, H. W., Mamanova, L., Huang, N., Szabo, P. A., Richardson, L., Bolt, L., Fasouli, E. S., Mahbubani, K. T., Prete, M., Tuck, L., Richoz, N., Tuong, Z. K., Campos, L., Mousa, H. S., Needham, E. J., Pritchard, S., Li, T., Elmentaite, R., Park, J., Rahmani, E., Chen, D., Menon, D. K., Bayraktar, O. A., James, L. K., Meyer, K. B., Yosef, N., Clatworthy, M. R., Sims, P. A., Farber, D. L., Saeb-Parsy, K., Jones, J. L., & Teichmann, S. A.
Venue
Science
Published
2022-05-13
Volume
376
Issue
6594
Pages
eabl5197-eabl5197
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4280596398
Cited by
1,159
References
92
FWCI
60.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.abl5197
The paper
Domínguez Conde, C., Xu, C., Jarvis, L. B., Rainbow, D. B., Wells, S. B., Gomes, T., Howlett, S. K., Suchanek, O., Polanski, K., King, H. W., Mamanova, L., Huang, N., Szabo, P. A., Richardson, L., Bolt, L., Fasouli, E. S., Mahbubani, K. T., Prete, M., Tuck, L., . . . Teichmann, S. A. (2022). Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl5197

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.