Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Designing Regenerative Biomaterial Therapies for the Clinic

Pashuck, E. Thomas, Stevens, Molly M.·2012·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Several academic, regulatory, and clinical aspects should be considered when moving biomaterials from the lab to the patient.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002717

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Pashuck, E. T., & Stevens, M. M.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2012-11-14
Volume
4
Issue
160
Pages
160sr4-160sr4
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2160467540
Cited by
240
References
16
FWCI
22.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Regenerative Biomaterial Therapies for the Clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002717
The paper
Pashuck, E. T., & Stevens, M. M. (2012). Designing Regenerative Biomaterial Therapies for the Clinic. Science Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002717

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.