Cited by 38Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatmentAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and Studies

Susceptibility of Pneumocystis to Echinocandins in Suspension and Biofilm Cultures

Open access
Cushion, Melanie T., Collins, Margaret S.·2011·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The targeted inhibition of cyst but not trophic development by anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin on Pneumocystis murina and Pneumocystis carinii in rodent models of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) was recently reported by us (M. T. Cushion et al., PLoS One 5:e8524, 2010). To better understand the effects of echinocandins on P. carinii , the same three compounds were evaluated in standard suspension and biofilm cultures supplemented with various concentrations of sera using the measurement of ATP as the indicator. In suspension cultures with 1 and 5% serum, anidulafungin was the most active compound but 10 and 20% serum abrogated the efficacy of all three echinocandins. Established biofilm cultures that included both the nonadherent and adherent phases were more resistant to micafungin than caspofungin regardless of serum concentration, while anidulafungin had significant activity at 1 and 5% serum concentrations. Nascent biofilms were mostly affected by anidulafungin in 1 and 5% serum, but none of the compounds showed significant activity in 20% serum. We show for the first time that (i) echinocandins differ in their abilities to deplete the ATP of Pneumocystis in biofilms and in suspension cultures, (ii) this variability mostly reflected the reported efficacies in animal models of infection, and (iii) high serum levels decreased the anti- Pneumocystis activities of the echinocandins in both in vitro systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.00017-11

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Members from Acremonium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis, in addition to Candida, are among the biofilm formers tested for drug susceptibility in vitro.

    “These include (in addition to Candida) members from Acremonium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, and Pneumocystis (9, 20, 35, 42, 79, 160, 176).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Cells in biofilms have been found to be more resistant to drugs compared with cells grown in suspension culture.

    “For example, a number of these biofilm formers (Table 3) have been tested for drug susceptibility in vitro, and cells in biofilms have been found to be more resistant to drugs compared with cells grown in suspension culture.”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Morphological examination of lung tissue infected by Pneumocystis jirovecii reveals a biofilm-like growth structure consisting of round yeast-form clusters that can be recapitulated in vitro under certain laboratory conditions.

    “Morphological examination of lung tissue infected by P. jirovecii reveals a biofilm-like growth structure consisting of round yeast-form clusters that can be recapitulated in vitro under certain laboratory conditions (35, 36).”

    From <i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms and Human Disease (2015) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cushion, M. T., & Collins, M. S.
Affiliations
Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2011-10
Volume
55
Issue
10
Pages
4513-4518
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2058633046
Cited by
38
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (N01-A1-25647)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI076104)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Pneumocystis carinii, Pneumocystis murina, echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, serum resistance, ATP depletion, cyst development, antifungal susceptibility
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Pneumocystis Infections, Biofilms, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Pneumocystis carinii, Rats, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review