Cited by 1,476Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotic Use and Resistance

ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes

Open access
Gupta, Sushim Kumar, Padmanabhan, Babu Roshan, Diene, Seydina M., Lopez-Rojas, Rafael, Kempf, Marie, Landraud, Luce, Rolain, Jean-Marc·2014·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

ARG-ANNOT (Antibiotic Resistance Gene-ANNOTation) is a new bioinformatic tool that was created to detect existing and putative new antibiotic resistance (AR) genes in bacterial genomes. ARG-ANNOT uses a local BLAST program in Bio-Edit software that allows the user to analyze sequences without a Web interface. All AR genetic determinants were collected from published works and online resources; nucleotide and protein sequences were retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database. After building a database that includes 1,689 antibiotic resistance genes, the software was tested in a blind manner using 100 random sequences selected from the database to verify that the sensitivity and specificity were at 100% even when partial sequences were queried. Notably, BLAST analysis results obtained using the rmtF gene sequence (a new aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene sequence that is not included in the database) as a query revealed that the tool was able to link this sequence to short sequences (17 to 40 bp) found in other genes of the rmt family with significant E values. Finally, the analysis of 178 Acinetobacter baumannii and 20 Staphylococcus aureus genomes allowed the detection of a significantly higher number of AR genes than the Resfinder gene analyzer and 11 point mutations in target genes known to be associated with AR. The average time for the analysis of a genome was 3.35 ± 0.13 min. We have created a concise database for BLAST using a Bio-Edit interface that can detect AR geneti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01310-13

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, S. K., Padmanabhan, B. R., Diene, S. M., Lopez-Rojas, R., Kempf, M., Landraud, L., & Rolain, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes, UMR CNRS 7278—IRD 198 IHU, Méditerranée Infection, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
  • Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocıo, Seville, Spain
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2014-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
212-220
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2118688136
Cited by
1,476
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 190 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
antibiotic resistance genes, bacterial genomes, BLAST database, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus
MeSH terms
Drug Resistance, Microbial, Software, Genome, Bacterial, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review