Cited by 67Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen Control

The Investigational Fungal Cyp51 Inhibitor VT-1129 Demonstrates Potent In Vitro Activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii

Open access
Lockhart, Shawn R., Fothergill, Annette W., Iqbal, Naureen, Bolden, Carol B., Grossman, Nina T., Garvey, Edward P., Brand, Stephen R., Hoekstra, William J. +4 more·2016·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The in vitro activities of the novel fungal Cyp51 inhibitor VT-1129 were evaluated against a large panel of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii isolates. VT-1129 demonstrated potent activities against both Cryptococcus species as demonstrated by low MIC 50 and MIC 90 values. For C. gattii , the in vitro potency was maintained against all genotypes. In addition, significantly lower geometric mean MICs were observed for VT-1129 than for fluconazole against C. neoformans , including isolates with reduced fluconazole susceptibility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.02770-15

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VT-1129 is an oral tetrazole with robust in vitro and in vivo efficacy against C. neoformans and C. gattii, maintaining activity (mean MIC 0.027 μg/mL) against fluconazole-resistant or dose-dependent C. neoformans isolates.

    “Preclinical studies have demonstrated robust in vitro and in vivo efficacy against C. neoformans and C. gattii, notably maintaining activity (mean MIC 0.027 μg/mL) against fluconazole-resistant or dose-dependent C. neoformans isolates (Fig. 1) [92–94].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lockhart, S. R., Fothergill, A. W., Iqbal, N., Bolden, C. B., Grossman, N. T., Garvey, E. P., Brand, S. R., Hoekstra, W. J., Schotzinger, R. J., Ottinger, E., Patterson, T. F., & Wiederhold, N. P.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Viamet Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2016-04
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
2528-2531
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2326587704
Cited by
67
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ai25475-8-0-1)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (N01-AI-25475, N01 AI025475)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
CYP51 inhibitors, Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gattii, antifungal activity, fluconazole resistance, minimum inhibitory concentration
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcus neoformans, Fungal Proteins, Genotype, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Pyridines, Tetrazoles, Drugs, Investigational, Fluconazole, Gene Expression, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Cryptococcus gattii, Sterol 14-Demethylase, 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review