Cited by 121Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Sequencing, Disruption, and Characterization of the Candida albicans Sterol Methyltransferase ( ERG6 ) Gene: Drug Susceptibility Studies in erg6 Mutants

Open access
Jensen-Pergakes, K. L., Kennedy, M. A., Lees, N. D., Barbuch, R., Koegel, C., Bard, M.·1998·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

The rise in the frequency of fungal infections and the increased resistance noted to the widely employed azole antifungals make the development of new antifungals imperative for human health. The sterol biosynthetic pathway has been exploited for the development of several antifungal agents (allylamines, morpholines, azoles), but additional potential sites for antifungal agent development are yet to be fully investigated. The sterol methyltransferase gene ( ERG6 ) catalyzes a biosynthetic step not found in humans and has been shown to result in several compromised phenotypes, most notably markedly increased permeability, when disrupted in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . The Candida albicans ERG6 gene was isolated by complementation of a S. cerevisiae erg6 mutant by using a C. albicans genomic library. Sequencing of the Candida ERG6 gene revealed high homology with the Saccharomyces version of ERG6 . The first copy of the Candida ERG6 gene was disrupted by transforming with the URA3 blaster system, and the second copy was disrupted by both URA3 blaster transformation and mitotic recombination. The resulting erg6 strains were shown to be hypersusceptible to a number of sterol synthesis and metabolic inhibitors, including terbinafine, tridemorph, fenpropiomorph, fluphenazine, cycloheximide, cerulenin, and brefeldin A. No increase in susceptibility to azoles was noted. Inhibitors of the ERG6 gene product would make the cell increasingly susceptible to antifungal agents as well as to new agents which normally would be excluded and would allow for clinical treatment at lower dosages. In addition, the availability of ERG6 would allow for its use as a screen for new antifungals targeted specifically to the sterol methyltransferase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.42.5.1160

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ERG1, ERG7, ERG9, ERG25, ERG26, and ERG27 are essential, while ERG2, ERG3, ERG5, ERG6, and ERG24 are considered non-essential in ergosterol biosynthesis.

    “By using the technology of gene disruption and controlled gene expression, ERG1 , ERG7 , ERG9 , ERG25 , ERG26 , and ERG27 have been proved to be essential, while ERG2 , ERG3 , ERG5 , ERG6 , and ERG24 are considered to be non-essential in ergosterol biosynthesis.”

    From The synthesis, regulation, and functions of sterols in<i>Candida albicans</i>: Well-known but still lots to learn (2016) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that viable C. albicans erg6 homozygotes demonstrate that ERG6 is not essential for viability. The paper does not establish the claimed essentiality classifications for ERG1, ERG7, ERG9, ERG25, ERG26, ERG27, ERG2, ERG3, ERG5, or ERG24. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ausubel, F., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1995. Short protocols in molecular biology, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen-Pergakes, K. L., Kennedy, M. A., Lees, N. D., Barbuch, R., Koegel, C., & Bard, M.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Hoechst Marion Roussel (United States) (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
1998-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
1160-1167
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2130745984
Cited by
121
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida albicans, ERG6, sterol methyltransferase, sterol biosynthesis, ergosterol, antifungal susceptibility, azole resistance, terbinafine, tridemorph, fluphenazine, cycloheximide, cerulenin, brefeldin A, gene disruption, mitotic recombination, antifungal drug targets, Saccharomyces cerevisiae complementation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antifungal Agents, Base Sequence, Candida albicans, Fungal Proteins, Genes, Fungal, Heterozygote, Methyltransferases, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review