The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of Gut Microbiota to Fasting and Hibernation in Syrian Hamsters
Open accessAbstract
Although hibernating mammals wake occasionally to eat during torpor, this period represents a state of fasting. Fasting is known to alter the gut microbiota in nonhibernating mammals; therefore, hibernation may also affect the gut microbiota. However, there are few reports of gut microbiota in hibernating mammals. The present study aimed to compare the gut microbiota in hibernating torpid Syrian hamsters with that in active counterparts by using culture-independent analyses. Hamsters were allocated to either torpid, fed active, or fasted active groups. Hibernation was successfully induced by maintaining darkness at 4°C. Flow cytometry analysis of cecal bacteria showed that 96-h fasting reduced the total gut bacteria. This period of fasting also reduced the concentrations of short chain fatty acids in the cecal contents. In contrast, total bacterial numbers and concentrations of short chain fatty acids were unaffected by hibernation. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments indicated that fasting and hibernation modulated the cecal microbiota. Analysis of 16S rRNA clone library and species-specific real-time quantitative PCR showed that the class Clostridia predominated in both active and torpid hamsters and that populations of Akkermansia muciniphila , a mucin degrader, were increased by fasting but not by hibernation. From these results, we conclude that the gut microbiota responds differently to fasting and hibernation in Syrian hamsters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium
Derrien, M., Vaughan, E. E., Plugge, C. M., & de Vos, W. M. (2004) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02873-0 · Cited by 2,094
Collado, M. C., Derrien, M., Isolauri, E., de Vos, W. M., & Salminen, S. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01477-07 · Cited by 706
Cited by
Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota
Donaldson, G. P., Lee, S. M., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3552 · Cited by 2,535
Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions
Derrien, M., Belzer, C., & de Vos, W. M. (2017) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.005 · Cited by 1,044
Schneeberger, M., Everard, A., Gómez-Valadés, A. G., Matamoros, S., Ramírez, S., Delzenne, N. M., Gomis, R., Claret, M., & Cani, P. D. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16643 · Cited by 798
Akkermansia muciniphila is a promising probiotic
Zhang, T., Li, Q., Cheng, L., Buch, H., & Zhang, F. (2019) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13410 · Cited by 708
Microbial regulation of organismal energy homeostasis
Cani, P. D., Van Hul, M., Lefort, C., Depommier, C., Rastelli, M., & Everard, A. (2019) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-018-0017-4 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonoyama, K., Fujiwara, R., Takemura, N., Ogasawara, T., Watanabe, J., Ito, H., & Morita, T.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2009-10-15
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 6451-6456
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2113802339
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of Gut Microbiota to Fasting and Hibernation in Syrian Hamsters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00692-09
- The paper
- Sonoyama, K., Fujiwara, R., Takemura, N., Ogasawara, T., Watanabe, J., Ito, H., & Morita, T. (2009). Response of Gut Microbiota to Fasting and Hibernation in Syrian Hamsters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00692-09
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.