Cited by 590CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseCAR-T cell therapy research

CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting β-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity

Open access
Cradick, Thomas J., Fine, Eli J., Antico, Christopher J., Bao, Gang·2013·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The ability to precisely modify endogenous genes can significantly facilitate biological studies and disease treatment, and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems have the potential to be powerful tools for genome engineering. However, the target specificity of CRISPR systems is largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting the human hemoglobin β and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 genes have substantial off-target cleavage, especially within the hemoglobin δ and C-C chemokine receptor type 2 genes, respectively, causing gross chromosomal deletions. The guide strands of the CRISPR/Cas9 systems were designed to have a range of mismatches with the sequences of potential off-target sites. Off-target analysis was performed using the T7 endonuclease I mutation detection assay and Sanger sequencing. We found that the repair of the on-and off-target cleavage resulted in a wide variety of insertions, deletions and point mutations. Therefore, CRISPR/Cas9 systems need to be carefully designed to avoid potential off-target cleavage sites, including those with mismatches to the 12-bases proximal to the guide strand protospacer-adjacent motif.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkt714

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In-depth studies on the outcomes of Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair have shown significant off-target effects, which resulted in substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation.

    “Moreover, in-depth studies on the outcomes of Cas9-induced double-strand break (DSB) repair have shown significant off-target effects, which resulted in substitution, insertion, deletion, and DNA translocation.”

    From Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results (page not provided) report off-target cleavage and repair outcomes including point mutations, insertions, and deletions, including gross chromosomal deletions. The Discussion (page not provided) suggests that translocations might occur, but does not report observing them; the claim overstates that outcome. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cradick, T. J., Fine, E. J., Antico, C. J., & Bao, G.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Bao, Gang
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2013-08-10
Volume
41
Issue
20
Pages
9584-9592
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2132401721
Cited by
590
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 16
FWCI
38.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1148903)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (PN2EY018244)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target cleavage, beta-globin, CCR5, CCR2, protospacer adjacent motif, mismatch tolerance, chromosomal deletion, genome editing specificity
MeSH terms
Chromosome Deletion, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Humans, Receptors, CCR5, DNA Cleavage, beta-Globins, Genetic Loci, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review