The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria
Open accessAbstract
A mixed culture of human fecal bacteria was grown for 120 days in a three-stage continuous culture system. To reproduce some of the nutritional and pH characteristics of the large gut, each vessel had a different operating volume (0.3, 0.5, and 0.8 liter) and pH (6.0, 6.5, and 7.0). A mixture of polysaccharides and proteins was used as carbon and nitrogen sources. Measurements of H2, CH4, S2-, sulfate reduction rates, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), and volatile fatty acids were made throughout the experiment. After 48 days of running, porcine gastric mucin (5.8 g/day) was independently fed to vessel 1 of the multichamber system. The mucin was extensively degraded as evidenced by the stimulation of volatile fatty acid production. In the absence of mucin, sulfate-reducing activity was comparatively insignificant and methanogenesis was the major route for the disposal of electrons. The reverse occurred upon the addition of mucin; sulfate reduction predominated and methanogenesis was completely inhibited. This was attributed to release of sulfate from the mucin which enabled SRB to outcompete methanogenic bacteria for H2. SRB stimulated by mucin were acetate-utilizing Desulfobacter spp., lactate- and H2-utilizing Desulfovibrio spp., and propionate-utilizing Desulfobulbus spp. When the mucin pump was switched off, the multichamber system reverted to a state close to its original equilibrium. These data provide further evidence that sulfated polysaccharides such as mucin may be a source of sulfate for SRB in the human large gut.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN NATURAL WATERS1
CLINE, J. D. (1969) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1969.14.3.0454 · Cited by 3,592
Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood
Cummings, J. H., Pomare, E. W., Branch, W. J., Naylor, C. P., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1987) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.28.10.1221 · Cited by 3,119
Self-citationMineralization of organic matter in the sea bed-the role of sulphate reduction
Jørgensen, B. B. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/296643a0 · Cited by 1,540
J⊘rgensen, B. B. (1978) · Geomicrobiology Journal · doi:10.1080/01490457809377721 · Cited by 721
Fermentation of mucin and plant polysaccharides by strains of Bacteroides from the human colon
Salyers, A. A., Vercellotti, J. R., West, S. E., & Wilkins, T. D. (1977) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.33.2.319-322.1977 · Cited by 691
Winfrey, M. R., & Zeikus, J. G. (1977) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.33.2.275-281.1977 · Cited by 464
Kinetic Analysis of Competition Between Sulfate Reducers and Methanogens for Hydrogen in Sediments
Lovley, D. R., Dwyer, D. F., & Klug, M. J. (1982) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.43.6.1373-1379.1982 · Cited by 448
Kristjansson, J. K., Sch�nheit, P., & Thauer, R. K. (1982) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00405893 · Cited by 430
The sulphate-reducing bacteria, 2nd ed.
Stewart, D. J. (1984) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(84)90100-5 · Cited by 415
Digestion of polysaccharides of potato in the small intestine of man
Englyst, H. N., & Cummings, J. H. (1987) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/45.2.423 · Cited by 392
Self-citation
Cited by
Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components
Rowland, I., Gibson, G., Heinken, A., Scott, K., Swann, J., Thiele, I., & Tuohy, K. (2018) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8 · Cited by 2,878
“Methanogens and sulphate reducers thus compete for hydrogen in the gut and the process that dominates is dependent on the amount of sulphate available [34, 35].”
BackgroundThe control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon
Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1991) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb02739.x · Cited by 1,499
Self-citationThe first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota
Rajilić-Stojanović, M., & de Vos, W. M. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12075 · Cited by 1,182
Molly, K., Vande Woestyne, M., & Verstraete, W. (1993) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf00228615 · Cited by 672
The gastrointestinal microbiota as a site for the biotransformation of drugs
Sousa, T., Paterson, R., Moore, V., Carlsson, A., Abrahamsson, B., & Basit, A. W. (2008) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.07.009 · Cited by 618
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibson, G. R., Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1988-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2750-2755
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2132918207
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.54.11.2750-2755.1988
- The paper
- Gibson, G. R., Cummings, J. H., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1988). Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.54.11.2750-2755.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.