Cited by 209Probiotics and Fermented FoodsPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsInfant Nutrition and Health

Factors Affecting Exocellular Polysaccharide Production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.bulgaricus Grown in a Chemically Defined Medium

Open access
Petry, Sandrine, Furlan, Sylviane, Crepeau, Marie-Jeanne, Cerning, Jutta, Desmazeaud, Michel·2000·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

We developed a chemically defined medium (CDM) containing lactose or glucose as the carbon source that supports growth and exopolysaccharide (EPS) production of two strains of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. The factors found to affect EPS production in this medium were oxygen, pH, temperature, and medium constituents, such as orotic acid and the carbon source. EPS production was greatest during the stationary phase. Composition analysis of EPS isolated at different growth phases and produced under different fermentation conditions (varying carbon source or pH) revealed that the component sugars were the same. The EPS from strain L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CNRZ 1187 contained galactose and glucose, and that of strain L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CNRZ 416 contained galactose, glucose, and rhamnose. However, the relative proportions of the individual monosaccharides differed, suggesting that repeating unit structures can vary according to specific medium alterations. Under pH-controlled fermentation conditions, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus strains produced as much EPS in the CDM as in milk. Furthermore, the relative proportions of individual monosaccharides of EPS produced in pH-controlled CDM or in milk were very similar. The CDM we developed may be a useful model and an alternative to milk in studies of EPS production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.66.8.3427-3431.2000

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lcb. casei and Lb. delbreuckii subsp. bulgaricus strains cultured in fermented milk produced a lower amount of EPS (<600 mg/L) compared to M17 broth supplemented with different carbon and nitrogen sources (1500 mg/L).

    “On the other hand, Lcb. casei and Lb. delbreuckii subsp. bulgaricus strains cultured in fermented milk produced a lower amount of EPS (<600 mg/L) compared to M17 broth supplemented with different carbon and nitrogen sources (1500 mg/L) [60].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [60]

    The introduction reports EPS yields of 50–425 mg/L in milk, supporting the claim that milk yields were below 600 mg/L. But the paper studies L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in a chemically defined medium, not L. casei in M17 broth, and does not report the claimed 1,500 mg/L M17 yield. The Results instead say that, with pH control, yields in the defined medium were about the same as in milk. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Thompson, D. I., L. Eckberg, and G. Sherman. 1978. Direct microscopic method for bacteria, p. 169-186. In E. H. Math (ed.) Standard methods for the examination of dairy products, 14th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petry, S., Furlan, S., Crepeau, M.-J., Cerning, J., & Desmazeaud, M.
Affiliations
  • <!--label omitted: 1-->Unité de Recherches Laitières et Génétique Appliquée, INRA, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex,1 and
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • <!--label omitted: 2-->Unité de Recherche sur les Polysaccharides, leur Organisation et Interaction, INRA, 44316 Nantes Cedex,2 France
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2000-08
Volume
66
Issue
8
Pages
3427-3431
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2144916775
Cited by
209
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
17.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
University College Dublin
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
exopolysaccharide production, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, chemically defined medium, carbon source, lactose, glucose, orotic acid, oxygen, pH, temperature, stationary phase, rhamnose, fermentation conditions
MeSH terms
Culture Media, Glucose, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Lactose, Monosaccharides, Polysaccharides, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review