The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Real-Time Quantitative PCR Procedure for Quantification of Bifidobacteria in Human Fecal Samples
Open accessAbstract
The application of a real-time quantitative PCR method (5′ nuclease assay), based on the use of a probe labeled at its 5′ end with a stable, fluorescent lanthanide chelate, for the quantification of human fecal bifidobacteria was evaluated. The specificities of the primers and the primer-probe combination were evaluated by conventional PCR and real-time PCR, respectively. The results obtained by real-time PCR were compared with those obtained by fluorescent in situ hybridization, the current gold standard for intestinal microbiota quantification. In general, a good correlation between the two methods was observed. In order to determine the detection limit and the accuracy of the real-time PCR procedure, germfree rat feces were spiked with known amounts of bifidobacteria and analyzed by both methods. The detection limit of the method used in this study was found to be about 5 × 10 4 cells per g of feces. Both methods, real-time PCR and fluorescent in situ hybridization, led to an accurate quantification of the spiked samples with high levels of bifidobacteria, but real-time PCR was more accurate for samples with low levels. We conclude that the real-time PCR procedure described here is a specific, accurate, rapid, and easy method for the quantification of bifidobacteria in feces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hopkins, M. J., Sharp, R., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2001) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.48.2.198 · Cited by 577
Cited by
Ramirez-Farias, C., Slezak, K., Fuller, Z., Duncan, A., Holtrop, G., & Louis, P. (2008) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114508019880 · Cited by 822
Collado, M. C., Derrien, M., Isolauri, E., de Vos, W. M., & Salminen, S. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01477-07 · Cited by 706
Self-citationEstablishment and development of intestinal microbiota in preterm neonates
Arboleya, S., Binetti, A., Salazar, N., Fernández, N., Solís, G., Hernández-Barranco, A., Margolles, A., los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G., & Gueimonde, M. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01261.x · Cited by 438
Self-citationSensitive Quantitative Detection of Commensal Bacteria by rRNA-Targeted Reverse Transcription-PCR
Matsuda, K., Tsuji, H., Asahara, T., Kado, Y., & Nomoto, K. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01224-06 · Cited by 294
Salazar, N., Dewulf, E. M., Neyrinck, A. M., Bindels, L. B., Cani, P. D., Mahillon, J., de Vos, W. M., Thissen, J.-P., Gueimonde, M., de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G., et al. (2015) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2014.06.001 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gueimonde, M., Tölkkö, S., Korpimäki, T., & Salminen, S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4165-4169
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2143320491
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Real-Time Quantitative PCR Procedure for Quantification of Bifidobacteria in Human Fecal Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.7.4165-4169.2004
- The paper
- Gueimonde, M., Tölkkö, S., Korpimäki, T., & Salminen, S. (2004). New Real-Time Quantitative PCR Procedure for Quantification of Bifidobacteria in Human Fecal Samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.7.4165-4169.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.