The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of Technology
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Viral disease diagnosis has traditionally relied on the isolation of viral pathogens in cell cultures. Although this approach is often slow and requires considerable technical expertise, it has been regarded for decades as the “gold standard” for the laboratory diagnosis of viral disease. With the development of nonculture methods for the rapid detection of viral antigens and/or nucleic acids, the usefulness of viral culture has been questioned. This review describes advances in cell culture-based viral diagnostic products and techniques, including the use of newer cell culture formats, cryopreserved cell cultures, centrifugation-enhanced inoculation, precytopathogenic effect detection, cocultivated cell cultures, and transgenic cell lines. All of these contribute to more efficient and less technically demanding viral detection in cell culture. Although most laboratories combine various culture and nonculture approaches to optimize viral disease diagnosis, virus isolation in cell culture remains a useful approach, especially when a viable isolate is needed, if viable and nonviable virus must be differentiated, when infection is not characteristic of any single virus (i.e., when testing for only one virus is not sufficient), and when available culture-based methods can provide a result in a more timely fashion than molecular methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lanciotti, R. S., Kerst, A. J., Nasci, R. S., Godsey, M. S., Mitchell, C. J., Savage, H. M., Komar, N., Panella, N. A., Allen, B. C., Volpe, K. E., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.11.4066-4071.2000 · Cited by 1,087
Molecular Methods for Diagnosis of Viral Encephalitis
DeBiasi, R. L., & Tyler, K. L. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.4.903-925.2004 · Cited by 274
Pipkin, P. A., Wood, D. J., Racaniello, V. R., & Minor, P. D. (1993) · Journal of Virological Methods · doi:10.1016/0166-0934(93)90022-j · Cited by 105
Aseptic meningitis: Diagnosis and management
Kumar, R. (2005) · The Indian Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/bf02760582 · Cited by 93
Cited by
Magnetic SERS Strip for Sensitive and Simultaneous Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Wang, C., Wang, C., Wang, X., Wang, K., Zhu, Y., Rong, Z., Wang, W., Xiao, R., & Wang, S. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b03920 · Cited by 304
The duration of infectiousness of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2
Walsh, K. A., Spillane, S., Comber, L., Cardwell, K., Harrington, P., Connell, J., Teljeur, C., Broderick, N., de Gascun, C. F., Smith, S. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.10.009 · Cited by 157
CSF in acute and chronic infectious diseases
(2018) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804279-3.00012-5 · Cited by 42
Ramamurthy, M., Alexander, M., Aaron, S., Kannangai, R., Ravi, V, Sridharan, G., & Abraham, A. (2011) · Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.4103/0255-0857.81777 · Cited by 28
AlGhounaim, M., Xiao, Y., Caya, C., & Papenburg, J. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Virology · doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2017.07.015 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Leland, D. S., & Ginocchio, C. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-78
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2165685167
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00002-06
- The paper
- Leland, D. S., & Ginocchio, C. C. (2007). Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of Technology. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00002-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.