The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The genus Entamoeba contains many species, six of which ( Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, Entamoeba polecki, Entamoeba coli , and Entamoeba hartmanni ) reside in the human intestinal lumen. Entamoeba histolytica is the causative agent of amebiasis and is considered a leading parasitic cause of death worldwide in humans. Although recent studies highlight the recovery of E. dispar and E. moshkovskii from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, there is still no convincing evidence of a causal link between the presence of these two species and the symptoms of the host. New approaches to the identification of E. histolytica are based on detection of E. histolytica -specific antigen and DNA in stool and other clinical samples. Several molecular diagnostic tests, including conventional and real-time PCR, have been developed for the detection and differentiation of E. histolytica , E. dispar , and E. moshkovskii in clinical samples. The purpose of this review is to discuss different methods that exist for the identification of E. histolytica , E. dispar , and E. moshkovskii which are available to the clinical diagnostic laboratory. To address the need for a specific diagnostic test for amebiasis, a substantial amount of work has been carried out over the last decade in different parts of the world. The molecular diagnostic tests are increasingly being used for both clinical and research purposes. In order to minimize undue treatment of individuals infected with other species of Entamoeba such as E. dispar and E. moshkovskii , efforts have been made for specific diagnosis of E. histolytica infection and not to treat based simply on the microscopic examination of Entamoeba species in the stool. The incorporation of many new technologies into the diagnostic laboratory will lead to a better understanding of the public health problem and measures to control the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
A new medium for the axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and other Entamoeba
Diamond, L. S., Harlow, D. R., & Cunnick, C. C. (1978) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/0035-9203(78)90144-x · Cited by 1,847
Stanley, S. L. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12830-9 · Cited by 1,153
Diagnostic Medical Parasitology
Esch, G. W., Garcia, L. S., & Bruckner, D. A. (1994) · The Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.2307/3283339 · Cited by 882
Haque, R., Huston, C. D., Hughes, M., Houpt, E., & Petri, W. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022710 · Cited by 839
Quantification using real-time PCR technology: applications and limitations
Klein, D. (2002) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02355-9 · Cited by 762
Walsh, J. A. (1986) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/8.2.228 · Cited by 656
Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model
Monteiro, L., Bonnemaison, D., Vekris, A., Petry, K. G., Bonnet, J., Vidal, R., Cabrita, J., & Mégraud, F. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.4.995-998.1997 · Cited by 551
Laboratory Diagnosis of Amebiasis
Tanyuksel, M., & Petri, W. A. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.4.713-729.2003 · Cited by 482
Methods for Cultivation of Luminal Parasitic Protists of Clinical Importance
Clark, C. G., & Diamond, L. S. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.3.329-341.2002 · Cited by 473
Cited by
The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota
Rajilić-Stojanović, M., & de Vos, W. M. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12075 · Cited by 1,182
Enteric Protozoa in the Developed World: a Public Health Perspective
Fletcher, S. M., Stark, D., Harkness, J., & Ellis, J. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05038-11 · Cited by 434
Self-citationFletcher, S. M., McLaws, M.-L., & Ellis, J. T. (2013) · Journal of Public Health Research · doi:10.4081/jphr.2013.e9 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fotedar, R., Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., & Harkness, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-532
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2133290730
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00004-07
- The paper
- Fotedar, R., Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., & Harkness, J. (2007). Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00004-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.