The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current and Past Strategies for Bacterial Culture in Clinical Microbiology
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: A pure bacterial culture remains essential for the study of its virulence, its antibiotic susceptibility, and its genome sequence in order to facilitate the understanding and treatment of caused diseases. The first culture conditions empirically varied incubation time, nutrients, atmosphere, and temperature; culture was then gradually abandoned in favor of molecular methods. The rebirth of culture in clinical microbiology was prompted by microbiologists specializing in intracellular bacteria. The shell vial procedure allowed the culture of new species of Rickettsia. The design of axenic media for growing fastidious bacteria such as Tropheryma whipplei and Coxiella burnetii and the ability of amoebal coculture to discover new bacteria constituted major advances. Strong efforts associating optimized culture media, detection methods, and a microaerophilic atmosphere allowed a dramatic decrease of the time of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture. The use of a new versatile medium allowed an extension of the repertoire of archaea. Finally, to optimize the culture of anaerobes in routine bacteriology laboratories, the addition of antioxidants in culture media under an aerobic atmosphere allowed the growth of strictly anaerobic species. Nevertheless, among usual bacterial pathogens, the development of axenic media for the culture of Treponema pallidum or Mycobacterium leprae remains an important challenge that the patience and innovations of cultivators will enable them to overcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Its Role as a Human Pathogen
Waites, K. B., & Talkington, D. F. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.4.697-728.2004 · Cited by 1,339
Moving pictures of the human microbiome
Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Costello, E. K., Berg-Lyons, D., Gonzalez, A., Stombaugh, J., Knights, D., Gajer, P., Ravel, J., Fierer, N., et al. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r50 · Cited by 1,138
Armougom, F., Henry, M., Vialettes, B., Raccah, D., & Raoult, D. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007125 · Cited by 905
Self-citationArchaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents
Hoffmann, C., Dollive, S., Grunberg, S., Chen, J., Li, H., Wu, G. D., Lewis, J. D., & Bushman, F. D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066019 · Cited by 808 · cited 2×
“An increased prevalence of Methanobrevibacter spp. correlated, albeit nonsignificantly, with short-term and long-term carbohydrate ingestion (160), as was the case in anorexic patients (175), whereas the prevalence of Nitrososphaera spp. correlated, albeit…”
BackgroundDridi, B., Fardeau, M.-L., Ollivier, B., Raoult, D., & Drancourt, M. (2012) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.033712-0 · Cited by 596
Self-citationGenomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut
Samuel, B. S., Hansen, E. E., Manchester, J. K., Coutinho, P. M., Henrissat, B., Fulton, R., Latreille, P., Kim, K., Wilson, R. K., & Gordon, J. I. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704189104 · Cited by 549
Pukatzki, S., Kessin, R. H., & Mekalanos, J. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.052704399 · Cited by 289
Borrel, G., Harris, H. M. B., Tottey, W., Mihajlovski, A., Parisot, N., Peyretaillade, E., Peyret, P., Gribaldo, S., O'Toole, P. W., & Brugère, J.-F. (2012) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01867-12 · Cited by 166
Dictyostelium as host model for pathogenesis
Steinert, M., & Heuner, K. (2005) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00493.x · Cited by 144
Cited by
Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions
Derrien, M., Belzer, C., & de Vos, W. M. (2017) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.005 · Cited by 1,044
Lagier, J.-C., Khelaifia, S., Alou, M. T., Ndongo, S., Dione, N., Hugon, P., Caputo, A., Cadoret, F., Traore, S. I., Seck, E. H., et al. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203 · Cited by 951
Self-citationRetracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Lagier, J.-C., Edouard, S., Pagnier, I., Mediannikov, O., Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 208-236
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2005644104
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 22.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current and Past Strategies for Bacterial Culture in Clinical Microbiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00110-14
- The paper
- Lagier, J.-C., Edouard, S., Pagnier, I., Mediannikov, O., Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D. (2015). Current and Past Strategies for Bacterial Culture in Clinical Microbiology. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00110-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.