The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most important cause of viral lower respiratory tract illness (LRI) in infants and children worldwide and causes significant LRI in the elderly and in immunocompromised patients. The goal of RSV vaccination is to prevent serious RSV-associated LRI. There are several obstacles to the development of successful RSV vaccines, including the need to immunize very young infants, who may respond inadequately to vaccination; the existence of two antigenically distinct RSV groups, A and B; and the history of disease enhancement following administration of a formalin-inactivated vaccine. It is likely that more than one type of vaccine will be needed to prevent RSV LRI in the various populations at risk. Although vector delivery systems, synthetic peptide, and immune-stimulating complex vaccines have been evaluated in animal models, only the purified F protein (PFP) subunit vaccines and live attenuated vaccines have been evaluated in recent clinical trials. PFP-2 appears to be a promising vaccine for the elderly and for RSV-seropositive children with underlying pulmonary disease, whereas live cold-passaged (cp), temperature-sensitive (ts) RSV vaccines (denoted cpts vaccines) would most probably be useful in young infants. The availability of cDNA technology should allow further refinement of existing live attenuated cpts candidate vaccines to produce engineered vaccines that are satisfactorily attenuated, immunogenic, and phenotypically stable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
KIM, H. W., CANCHOLA, J. G., BRANDT, C. D., PYLES, G., CHANOCK, R. M., JENSEN, K., & PARROTT, R. H. (1969) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120955 · Cited by 1,981
Groothuis, J. R., Simoes, E., Levin, M. J., Hall, C. B., Long, C. E., Rodriguez, W. J., Arrobio, J., Meissner, H. C., Fulton, D. R., Welliver, R. C., et al. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199311183292102 · Cited by 744
Cited by
Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Infection, Detection, and New Options for Prevention and Treatment
Griffiths, C., Drews, S. J., & Marchant, D. J. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00010-16 · Cited by 586
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Adults
Falsey, A. R., & Walsh, E. E. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.3.371 · Cited by 438
COVID-19 Vaccine Frontrunners and Their Nanotechnology Design
Chung, Y. H., Beiss, V., Fiering, S. N., & Steinmetz, N. F. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c07197 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Dudas, R. A., & Karron, R. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 430-439
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2168544733
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.11.3.430
- The paper
- Dudas, R. A., & Karron, R. A. (1998). Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.11.3.430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.