Cited by 95Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen Control

A Repurposing Approach Identifies Off-Patent Drugs with Fungicidal Cryptococcal Activity, a Common Structural Chemotype, and Pharmacological Properties Relevant to the Treatment of Cryptococcosis

Open access
Butts, Arielle, DiDone, Louis, Koselny, Kristy, Baxter, Bonnie K., Chabrier-Rosello, Yeissa, Wellington, Melanie, Krysan, Damian J.·2013·Eukaryotic Cell

Abstract

New, more accessible therapies for cryptococcosis represent an unmet clinical need of global importance. We took a repurposing approach to identify previously developed drugs with fungicidal activity toward Cryptococcus neoformans , using a high-throughput screening assay designed to detect drugs that directly kill fungi. From a set of 1,120 off-patent medications and bioactive molecules, we identified 31 drugs/molecules with fungicidal activity, including 15 drugs for which direct antifungal activity had not previously been reported. A significant portion of the drugs are orally bioavailable and cross the blood-brain barrier, features key to the development of a widely applicable anticryptococcal agent. Structural analysis of this set revealed a common chemotype consisting of a hydrophobic moiety linked to a basic amine, features that are common to drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier and access the phagolysosome, two important niches of C. neoformans . Consistent with their fungicidal activity, the set contains eight drugs that are either additive or synergistic in combination with fluconazole. Importantly, we identified two drugs, amiodarone and thioridazine, with activity against intraphagocytic C. neoformans . Finally, the set of drugs is also enriched for molecules that inhibit calmodulin, and we have confirmed that seven drugs directly bind C. neoformans calmodulin, providing a molecular target that may contribute to the mechanism of antifungal activity. Taken together, these studies provide a foundation for the optimization of the antifungal properties of a set of pharmacologically attractive scaffolds for the development of novel anticryptococcal therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/ec.00314-12

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A screen with the Prestwick Chemical Library of 1,120 off-patent drugs and molecules identified 31 molecules with fungilytic activity.

    “For example, a screen with the Prestwick Chemical Library of 1,120 off-patent drugs and molecules identified 31 molecules with fungilytic activity111.”
  • Analysis of the chemical structures of drugs with anti-cryptococcal activity revealed a general structure comprising a hydrophobic or lipophilic moiety linked to a cationic amine substituent.

    “Analysis of the chemical structures of drugs with anti-cryptococcal activity revealed a general structure comprising a hydrophobic or lipophilic moiety linked to a cationic amine substituent111.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butts, A., DiDone, L., Koselny, K., Baxter, B. K., Chabrier-Rosello, Y., Wellington, M., & Krysan, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
Venue
Eukaryotic Cell
Published
2013-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
278-287
ISSN
  • 1535-9778 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-9786
OpenAlex
W2117206304
Cited by
95
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eukaryotic Cell (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Center, University of Rochester
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI007464, R01AI091422)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, drug repurposing, off-patent drugs, fungicidal activity, blood-brain barrier, oral bioavailability, chemotypes, amiodarone, thioridazine, calmodulin inhibition, fluconazole synergy, phagolysosomes, antifungal drug discovery
MeSH terms
Adenylate Kinase, Amiodarone, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Calmodulin, Cells, Cultured, Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Drug Synergism, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Patents as Topic, Phagocytes, Structure-Activity Relationship, Suloctidil, Thioridazine, Fluconazole, Mice, Small Molecule Libraries, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review