The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Direct Colony Method versus Extraction Method for Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated Bruker Biotyper (version 2.0) matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of 305 clinical isolates of staphylococci, streptococci, and related genera by comparing direct colony testing with preparatory extraction. Isolates were previously identified by use of phenotypic testing and/or 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Manufacturer-specified score cutoffs for genus- and species-level identification were used. After excluding 7 isolates not present in the Biotyper library, the Biotyper correctly identified 284 (95%) and 207 (69%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, using extraction. By using direct colony testing, the Biotyper identified 168 (56%) and 60 (20%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. Overall, more isolates were identified to the genus and species levels with preparatory extraction than with direct colony testing ( P < 0.0001). The analysis was repeated after dividing the isolates into two subgroups, staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci ( n = 217) and “related genera” ( n = 81). For the former subgroup, the extraction method resulted in the identification of 213 (98%) and 171 (79%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, whereas the direct colony method identified 136 (63%) and 56 (26%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. In contrast, for the subgroup of related genera, the extraction method identified 71 (88%) and 36 (44%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively, while the direct colony method identified 32 (40%) and 4 (5%) isolates to the genus and species levels, respectively. For both subgroups, preparatory extraction was superior to direct colony testing for the identification of isolates to the genus and species levels ( P < 0.0001). Preparatory extraction is needed for the identification of a substantial proportion of Gram-positive cocci using the Biotyper method according to manufacturer-specified score cutoffs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seng, P., Drancourt, M., Gouriet, F., La Scola, B., Fournier, P., Rolain, J. M., & Raoult, D. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/600885 · Cited by 1,983 · cited 7×
“This observation is in agreement with a previous report that accurate MALDI-TOF MS identifications correlated with 10 reference spectra for a given species in the database (17).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Cited by
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis
Singhal, N., Kumar, M., Kanaujia, P. K., & Virdi, J. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00791 · Cited by 1,605
Tan, K. E., Ellis, B. C., Lee, R., Stamper, P. D., Zhang, S. X., & Carroll, K. C. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01405-12 · Cited by 326
Lévesque, S., Dufresne, P. J., Soualhine, H., Domingo, M.-C., Bekal, S., Lefebvre, B., & Tremblay, C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144878 · Cited by 172
Identification and differentiation of avian Mycoplasma species using MALDI-TOF MS
Baudler, L., Scheufen, S., Ziegler, L., Möller Palau-Ribes, F., Ewers, C., & Lierz, M. (2019) · Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation · doi:10.1177/1040638719856932 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Alatoom, A. A., Cunningham, S. A., Ihde, S. M., Mandrekar, J., & Patel, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2868-2873
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1970788266
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Direct Colony Method versus Extraction Method for Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.00506-11
- The paper
- Alatoom, A. A., Cunningham, S. A., Ihde, S. M., Mandrekar, J., & Patel, R. (2011). Comparison of Direct Colony Method versus Extraction Method for Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci by Use of Bruker Biotyper Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00506-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.