The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance and Cost Analysis of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Routine Identification of Yeast
Open accessAbstract
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was compared to phenotypic testing for yeast identification. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry yielded 96.3% and 84.5% accurate species level identifications (spectral scores, ≥1.8) for 138 common and 103 archived strains of yeast. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is accurate, rapid (5.1 min of hands-on time/identification), and cost-effective ($0.50/sample) for yeast identification in the clinical laboratory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,411
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook
(2016) · ASM Press eBooks · doi:10.1128/9781555818814 · Cited by 2,240
Seng, P., Drancourt, M., Gouriet, F., La Scola, B., Fournier, P., Rolain, J. M., & Raoult, D. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/600885 · Cited by 1,983 · cited 1×
“These values are lower than those for conventional and other molecular testing and are in agreement with previous studies (5, 25).”
ResultCharacterization of intact microorganisms by MALDI mass spectrometry
Fenselau, C., & Demirev, P. A. (2001) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.10004 · Cited by 834
Medically Important Fungi: A Guide to Identification
Larone, D. H. (1976) · Cited by 809
van Veen, S. Q., Claas, E. C. J., & Kuijper, E. J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02071-09 · Cited by 667
Medically important fungi: A guide to identification
Ajello, L. (1989) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/0732-8893(89)90040-0 · Cited by 662
Bizzini, A., Durussel, C., Bille, J., Greub, G., & Prod'hom, G. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01794-09 · Cited by 615
Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens
Walsh, T. J., Groll, A., Hiemenz, J., Fleming, R., Roilides, E., & Anaissie, E. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00839.x · Cited by 601
Cherkaoui, A., Hibbs, J., Emonet, S., Tangomo, M., Girard, M., Francois, P., & Schrenzel, J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01881-09 · Cited by 527
Cited by
Yarrowia lipolytica: Safety assessment of an oleaginous yeast with a great industrial potential
Groenewald, M., Boekhout, T., Neuvéglise, C., Gaillardin, C., van Dijck, P. W. M., & Wyss, M. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/1040841x.2013.770386 · Cited by 498
Biomedical Mass Spectrometry in Today's and Tomorrow's Clinical Microbiology Laboratories
van Belkum, A., Welker, M., Erhard, M., & Chatellier, S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00420-12 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhiman, N., Hall, L., Wohlfiel, S. L., Buckwalter, S. P., & Wengenack, N. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1614-1616
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2135225892
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 21.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance and Cost Analysis of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Routine Identification of Yeast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.02381-10
- The paper
- Dhiman, N., Hall, L., Wohlfiel, S. L., Buckwalter, S. P., & Wengenack, N. L. (2011). Performance and Cost Analysis of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Routine Identification of Yeast. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.02381-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
