The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes Ticks in the Baltic Regions of Russia
Open accessAbstract
The presence and distribution of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato was demonstrated among ixodid ticks collected in the Baltic regions of Russia, where Lyme borreliosis is endemic. A total of 3,426 Ixodes ricinus and 1,267 Ixodes persulcatus specimens were collected, and dark-field microscopy showed that 265 (11.5%)I. ricinus and 333 (26.3%)I. persulcatus ticks were positive. From these samples, 472 dark-field-positive and 159 dark-field-negative ticks were subjected to PCR and subsequent reverse line blot hybridization. Fifty-four ticks (8.6%) carried Ehrlichia species, and 4 (0.6%) carried ehrlichiae belonging to the Ehrlichia phagocytophila complex, which includes the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent. The E. phagocytophila complex and an Ehrlichia-like species were detected only in I. ricinus whereas Ehrlichia muris was found exclusively in I. persulcatus, indicating a possible vector-specific infection.Borrelia garinii was found predominantly in I. persulcatus, but Borrelia afzelii was evenly distributed among the two tick species. Only two I. ricinus ticks carried B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, while Borrelia valaisiana and a newly identified B. afzelii-like species were found in 1.7 and 2.5% of all ticks, respectively. Of the dark-field-positive ticks, only 64.8% yielded a Borrelia PCR product, indicating that dark-field microscopy may detect organisms other than B. burgdorferi sensu lato. These observations show that the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis may be present in ticks in the Baltic regions of Russia and that clinicians should be aware of this agent as a cause of febrile disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anaplasma phagocytophilum—a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies
Stuen, S., Granquist, E. G., & Silaghi, C. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00031 · Cited by 603
Rizzoli, A., Silaghi, C., Obiegala, A., Rudolf, I., Hubálek, Z., Földvári, G., Plantard, O., Vayssier-Taussat, M., Bonnet, S., Å pitalská, E., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00251 · Cited by 513
Lyme borreliosis in Europe and North America
PIESMAN, J., & GERN, L. (2004) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182003004694 · Cited by 373
Guideline for veterinary practitioners on canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Europe
Sainz, Á., Roura, X., Miró, G., Estrada-Peña, A., Kohn, B., Harrus, S., & Solano-Gallego, L. (2015) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0649-0 · Cited by 369
Emergence of a New Pathogenic Ehrlichia Species, Wisconsin and Minnesota, 2009
Pritt, B. S., Sloan, L. M., Johnson, D. K. H., Munderloh, U. G., Paskewitz, S. M., McElroy, K. M., McFadden, J. D., Binnicker, M. J., Neitzel, D. F., Liu, G., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1010493 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Alekseev, A. N., Dubinina, H. V., Van De Pol, I., & Schouls, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2237-2242
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2086265823
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes Ticks in the Baltic Regions of Russia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.39.6.2237-2242.2001
- The paper
- Alekseev, A. N., Dubinina, H. V., Van De Pol, I., & Schouls, L. M. (2001). Identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes Ticks in the Baltic Regions of Russia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.6.2237-2242.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.