Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human β-Defensins 2 and 3 Demonstrate Strain-Selective Activity against Oral Microorganisms

Open access
Joly, Sophie, Maze, Connie, McCray, Paul B., Guthmiller, Janet M.·2004·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Human β-defensins 2 and 3 (HBD-2 and HBD-3) are inducible peptides present at sites of infection in the oral cavity. A few studies have reported broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity for both peptides. However, no comprehensive study has thoroughly investigated their potential against oral pathogens. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of HBD-2 and HBD-3 against a collection of oral organisms ( Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans , Fusobacterium nucleatum , Porphyromonas gingivalis , Peptostreptococcus micros , Actinomyces naeslundii , Actinomyces israelii , Streptococcus sanguis , Streptococcus mutans , Candida tropicalis , Candida parapsilosis , Candida krusei , Candida glabrata , and Candida albicans ). Radial diffusion assays were used to test HBD-2 and HBD-3 activities against at least three strains of each species. There was significant variability in MICs, which was strain specific rather than species specific. MICs ranged from 3.9 to >250 μg/ml for HBD-2 and from 1.4 to >250 μg/ml for HBD-3. HBD-3 demonstrated greater antimicrobial activity and was effective against a broader array of organisms. Overall, aerobes were 100% susceptible to HBD-2 and HBD-3, whereas only 21.4 and 50% of the anaerobes were susceptible to HBD-2 and HBD-3, respectively. HBD-2 and HBD-3 also demonstrated strain-specific activity against the Candida species evaluated. Interestingly, an association between HBD-2 and HBD-3 activities was noted. This suggests that the two peptides may have similar mechanisms yet utilize distinct pathways. The lack of activity against specific anaerobic strains and Candida warrants further investigation of the potential resistance mechanisms of these organisms. Finally, the significant variability between strains underlies the importance of testing multiple strains when evaluating activities of antimicrobial peptides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.42.3.1024-1029.2004

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Joly, S., Maze, C., McCray, P. B., & Guthmiller, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2004-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
1024-1029
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2020137152
Cited by
291
References
42
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human β-Defensins 2 and 3 Demonstrate Strain-Selective Activity against Oral Microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.42.3.1024-1029.2004
The paper
Joly, S., Maze, C., McCray, P. B., & Guthmiller, J. M. (2004). Human β-Defensins 2 and 3 Demonstrate Strain-Selective Activity against Oral Microorganisms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.3.1024-1029.2004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.