The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Multicellular Aggregates in Biofilm Formation
Open accessAbstract
In traditional models of in vitro biofilm development, individual bacterial cells seed a surface, multiply, and mature into multicellular, three-dimensional structures. Much research has been devoted to elucidating the mechanisms governing the initial attachment of single cells to surfaces. However, in natural environments and during infection, bacterial cells tend to clump as multicellular aggregates, and biofilms can also slough off aggregates as a part of the dispersal process. This makes it likely that biofilms are often seeded by aggregates and single cells, yet how these aggregates impact biofilm initiation and development is not known. Here we use a combination of experimental and computational approaches to determine the relative fitness of single cells and preformed aggregates during early development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. We find that the relative fitness of aggregates depends markedly on the density of surrounding single cells, i.e., the level of competition for growth resources. When competition between aggregates and single cells is low, an aggregate has a growth disadvantage because the aggregate interior has poor access to growth resources. However, if competition is high, aggregates exhibit higher fitness, because extending vertically above the surface gives cells at the top of aggregates better access to growth resources. Other advantages of seeding by aggregates, such as earlier switching to a biofilm-like phenotype and enhanced resilience toward antibiotics and immune response, may add to this ecological benefit. Our findings suggest that current models of biofilm formation should be reconsidered to incorporate the role of aggregates in biofilm initiation. IMPORTANCE During the past decades, there has been a consensus around the model of development of a biofilm, involving attachment of single planktonic bacterial cells to a surface and the subsequent development of a mature biofilm. This study presents results that call for a modification of this rigorous model. We show how free floating biofilm aggregates can have a profound local effect on biofilm development when attaching to a surface. Our findings show that an aggregate landing on a surface will eventually outcompete the biofilm population arising from single cells attached around the aggregate and dominate the local biofilm development. These results point to a regime where preformed biofilm aggregates may have a fitness advantage over planktonic cells when it comes to accessing nutrients. Our findings add to the increasingly prominent comprehension that biofilm lifestyle is the default for bacteria and that planktonic single cells may be only a transition state at the most.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Autoaggregation is also often among the first steps in forming biofilms.”
From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Autoaggregation and microcolony formation are among the first steps in building a biofilm.”
From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At high cell densities, aggregated cells have a competitive advantage over single cells, as the cells positioned at the top of the aggregate have more access to nutrients. However, at low cell densities, the aggregated cells are at a disadvantage, as the cells in the middle of the aggregate have limited nutrient access [2].”
From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This view is supported by the recent work showing that, under high competition with single cells, cells positioned at the top of aggregates enjoy a competitive advantage [2].”
From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D. E., Korber, D. R., & Lappin-Scott, H. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431 · Cited by 4,921
Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces
Donlan, R. M. (2002) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0809.020063 · Cited by 4,894
Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms
Høiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Givskov, M., Molin, S., & Ciofu, O. (2010) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011 · Cited by 3,238
Self-citationMicrobial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O’Toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,184
Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,483
Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program comstat
Heydorn, A., Nielsen, A. T., Hentzer, M., Sternberg, C., Givskov, M., Ersbøll, B. K., & Molin, S. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 · Cited by 2,185
Stewart, P. S. (2003) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.185.5.1485-1491.2003 · Cited by 1,188
Social evolution theory for microorganisms
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., Gardner, A., & Diggle, S. P. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1461 · Cited by 1,183
Self-citationBiofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants
Klausen, M., Heydorn, A., Ragas, P. C., Lambertsen, L. M., Aaes‐Jørgensen, A., Molin, S., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2003) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03525.x · Cited by 1,055
Biofilms, the customized microniche
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., de Beer, D., Caldwell, D. E., Korber, D. R., & James, G. A. (1994) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.176.8.2137-2142.1994 · Cited by 999
Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal
McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D., & Kjelleberg, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2695 · Cited by 881
Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients
Bjarnsholt, T., Jensen, P. Ø., Fiandaca, M. J., Pedersen, J., Hansen, C. R., Andersen, C. B., Pressler, T., Givskov, M., & Høiby, N. (2009) · Pediatric Pulmonology · doi:10.1002/ppul.21011 · Cited by 796
Self-citationBjarnsholt, T., Alhede, M., Alhede, M., Eickhardt-Sørensen, S. R., Moser, C., Kühl, M., Jensen, P. Ø., & Høiby, N. (2013) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002 · Cited by 764
Self-citationThe Solubility of Oxygen and Ozone in Liquids
Battino, R., Rettich, T. R., & Tominaga, T. (1983) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555680 · Cited by 741
Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics
Orr, H. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2603 · Cited by 730
Biofilm formation and dispersal and the transmission of human pathogens
Hall‐Stoodley, L., & Stoodley, P. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.004 · Cited by 578
Picioreanu, C., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Heijnen, J. J. (1998) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19980405)58:1 · Cited by 525
Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms
Xavier, J. B., & Foster, K. R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607651104 · Cited by 514
Bjarnsholt, T., Jensen, P. Ø., Burmølle, M., Hentzer, M., Haagensen, J. A. J., Hougen, H. P., Calum, H., Madsen, K. G., Moser, C. E., Molin, S., et al. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.27463-0 · Cited by 501
Self-citationNonrandom Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in Chronic Wounds
Fazli, M., Bjarnsholt, T., Kirketerp‐Møller, K., Jørgensen, B., Andersen, A. S., Krogfelt, K. A., Givskov, M., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01395-09 · Cited by 496
Self-citationDéziel, É., Comeau, Y., & Villemur, R. (2001) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.183.4.1195-1204.2001 · Cited by 463
Individual-based modelling of biofilms
Kreft, J., Picioreanu, C., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & WIMPENNY, J. W. T. (2001) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-147-11-2897 · Cited by 420
Emergence of Spatial Structure in Cell Groups and the Evolution of Cooperation
Nadell, C. D., Foster, K. R., & Xavier, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000716 · Cited by 353
Phenotypes of Non-Attached Pseudomonas aeruginosa Aggregates Resemble Surface Attached Biofilm
Alhede, M., Kragh, K. N., Qvortrup, K., Allesen‐Holm, M., van Gennip, M., Hultqvist, L. D., Jensen, P. Ø., Nielsen, A. K., Parsek, M. R., Wozniak, D., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027943 · Cited by 324
Self-citationHypothesis for the Role of Nutrient Starvation in Biofilm Detachment
Hunt, S. M., Werner, E., Huang, B., Hamilton, M. A., & Stewart, P. S. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.12.7418-7425.2004 · Cited by 312
Particle-Based Multidimensional Multispecies Biofilm Model
Picioreanu, C., Kreft, J., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.5.3024-3040.2004 · Cited by 305
iDynoMiCS: next‐generation individual‐based modelling of biofilms
Lardon, L. A., Merkey, B. V., Martins, S. C. S., Dötsch, A., Picioreanu, C., Kreft, J., & Smets, B. F. (2011) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02414.x · Cited by 251
Purevdorj-Gage, B., Costerton, W. J., & Stoodley, P. (2005) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.27536-0 · Cited by 228
Highly adherent small-colony variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection
Häußler, S., Ziegler, I., Löttel, A., Götz, F. V., Rohde, M., Wehmhöhner, D., Saravanamuthu, S., Tümmler, B., & Steinmetz, I. (2003) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.05069-0 · Cited by 228
Schleheck, D., Barraud, N., Klebensberger, J., Webb, J. S., McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. J. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005513 · Cited by 222
Finger Formation in Biofilm Layers
Klapper, I., & Dockery, J. D. (2002) · SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/s0036139900371709 · Cited by 215
A framework for multidimensional modelling of activity and structure of multispecies biofilms
Xavier, J. B., Picioreanu, C., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2005) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00787.x · Cited by 207
Three‐dimensional biofilm model with individual cells and continuum EPS matrix
Erik Alpkvist, A., Picioreanu, C., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Heyden, A. (2006) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20917 · Cited by 198
Bar‐Zeev, E., Berman‐Frank, I., Girshevitz, O., & Berman, T. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1203708109 · Cited by 190
Localized Gene Expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms
Lenz, A. P., Williamson, K. S., Pitts, B., Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00710-08 · Cited by 174
Oxygen Limitation within a Bacterial Aggregate
Wessel, A. K., Arshad, T. A., Fitzpatrick, M. D., Connell, J. L., Bonnecaze, R. T., Shear, J. B., & Whiteley, M. (2014) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00992-14 · Cited by 154
Kragh, K. N., Alhede, M., Jensen, P. Ø., Moser, C. E., Scheike, T., Jacobsen, C. S., Poulsen, S. S., Eickhardt, S. R., Trøstrup, H., Christoffersen, L., et al. (2014) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01969-14 · Cited by 150
Self-citationA simple 2D biofilm model yields a variety of morphological features
Hermanowicz, S. W. (2001) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/s0025-5564(00)00049-3 · Cited by 112
Growing and Analyzing Biofilms in Flow Chambers
Tolker‐Nielsen, T., & Sternberg, C. (2011) · Current Protocols in Microbiology · doi:10.1002/9780471729259.mc01b02s21 · Cited by 104
Morphological evidence of biofilm formation in Greenlanders with chronic suppurative otitis media
Homøe, P., Bjarnsholt, T., Wessman, M., Sørensen, H. C. F., & Johansen, H. K. (2009) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-009-0940-9 · Cited by 101
Self-citationShaping the growth behaviour of biofilms initiated from bacterial aggregates
Melaugh, G., Hutchison, J., Kragh, K. N., Irie, Y., Roberts, A., Bjarnsholt, T., Diggle, S. P., Gordon, V. D., & Allen, R. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149683 · Cited by 93
Self-citationThe double substrate growth kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Beyenal, H., Chen, S. N., & Lewandowski, Z. (2002) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/s0141-0229(02)00246-6 · Cited by 87
Estrela, S., & Brown, S. P. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003398 · Cited by 84
Stoodley, P., Hall‐Stoodley, L., & Lappin-Scott, H. M. (2001) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(01)37023-4 · Cited by 76
Biofilms’ Role in Planktonic Cell Proliferation
Bester, E., Wolfaardt, G. M., Aznaveh, N. B., & Greener, J. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms141121965 · Cited by 40
Single-Cell Control of Initial Spatial Structure in Biofilm Development Using Laser Trapping
Hutchison, J., Rodesney, C., Kaushik, K. S., Le, H. H., Hurwitz, D. A., Irie, Y., & Gordon, V. D. (2014) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la500128y · Cited by 21
Self-citationShaping the Growth Behaviour of Bacterial Aggregates in BiofilmsPreprint
Melaugh, G., Hutchison, J., Kragh, K. N., Irie, Y., Roberts, A. E. L., Bjarnsholt, T., Diggle, S., Gordon, V. D., & Allen, R. J. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Characklis WG, Marshall KC. 1990. Biofilms. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life
Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Steinberg, P., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94 · Cited by 5,979
Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities
Sharma, D., Misba, L., & Khan, A. U. (2019) · Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control · doi:10.1186/s13756-019-0533-3 · Cited by 1,637
The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation
Sauer, K., Stoodley, P., Goeres, D. M., Hall‐Stoodley, L., Burmølle, M., Stewart, P. S., & Bjarnsholt, T. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00767-0 · Cited by 1,581
Self-citationComprehensive review of antimicrobial activities of plant flavonoids
Górniak, I., Bartoszewski, R., & Króliczewski, J. (2018) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-018-9591-z · Cited by 1,268
Rumbaugh, K. P., & Sauer, K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0385-0 · Cited by 989
Metadata
- Authors
- Kragh, K. N., Hutchison, J. B., Melaugh, G., Rodesney, C., Roberts, A. E. L., Irie, Y., Jensen, P. Ø., Diggle, S. P., Allen, R. J., Gordon, V., & Bjarnsholt, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- University of Bath (GB)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bjarnsholt, Thomas
- ORCID
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2016-05-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e00237-e00237
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- PMC
- PMC4807362
- OpenAlex
- W2307656886
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 17
- FWCI
- 19.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
- Funders
- Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0081/2012)
- Royal Society
- Lundbeckfonden
- University of Texas at Austin
- Exxon Mobil Corporation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Escherichia coli research studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- biofilm formation, multicellular aggregates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilm initiation, cell competition, planktonic cells, biofilm dispersal, antibiotic resistance, immune evasion
- MeSH terms
- Cell Adhesion, Computer Simulation, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Biofilms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
