Cited by 14Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Toward the consensus of definitions for the phenomena of antifungal tolerance and persistence in filamentous fungi

Open access
Amich, Jorge, Bromley, Michael, Goldman, Gustavo H., Valero, Clara·2025·mBio

Abstract

Antifungal drug tolerance and persistence are being increasingly recognized in fungal pathogens. Accordingly, more and more research is being carried out to characterize and understand these phenomena. However, the terminology and methodology employed in the fungal community lack consensus, particularly for filamentous fungi, as they present further complexities when compared to single-celled microorganisms. Hence, with the aim to ensure consistency in the literature, in this Perspective article, we propose tailored definitions for tolerance and persistence in filamentous fungi and suggest methods to detect and investigate these phenomena in the laboratory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.03475-24

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A drug that can kill at least 90% of spores in 24 h (MDK90 ≤ 24 h) of all isolates of a given species should be considered fungicidal.

    “A paper proposes that a drug that can kill ≥90% of spores in 24 h (MDK90 ≤ 24 h) of all isolates of a given species should be considered fungicidal [42].”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amich, J., Bromley, M., Goldman, G. H., & Valero, C.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Amich, Jorge
  • Bromley, Michael
  • Goldman, Gustavo H.
  • Valero, Clara
Venue
mBio
Published
2025-04-09
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
e0347524-e0347524
ISSN
2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407913755
Cited by
14
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
antifungal tolerance, filamentous fungi, fungal pathogens, terminology, definitions, detection methods, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Drug Tolerance, Fungi, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Terminology as Topic, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review