The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation on Microarray Analysis of Smad2/3 Binding Sites Reveals Roles of ETS1 and TFAP2A in Transforming Growth Factor β Signaling
Open accessAbstract
The Smad2 and Smad3 (Smad2/3) proteins are principally involved in the transmission of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) signaling from the plasma membrane to the nucleus. Many transcription factors have been shown to cooperate with the Smad2/3 proteins in regulating the transcription of target genes, enabling appropriate gene expression by cells. Here we identified 1,787 Smad2/3 binding sites in the promoter regions of over 25,500 genes by chromatin immunoprecipitation on microarray in HaCaT keratinocytes. Binding elements for the v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ETS) and transcription factor AP-2 (TFAP2) were significantly enriched in Smad2/3 binding sites, and knockdown of either ETS1 or TFAP2A resulted in overall alteration of TGF-beta-induced transcription, suggesting general roles for ETS1 and TFAP2A in the transcription induced by TGF-beta-Smad pathways. We identified novel Smad binding sites in the CDKN1A gene where Smad2/3 binding was regulated by ETS1 and TFAP2A. Moreover, we showed that small interfering RNAs for ETS1 and TFAP2A affected TGF-beta-induced cytostasis. We also analyzed Smad2- or Smad3-specific target genes regulated by TGF-beta and found that their specificity did not appear to be solely determined by the amounts of the Smad2/3 proteins bound to the promoters. These findings reveal novel regulatory mechanisms of Smad2/3-induced transcription and provide an essential resource for understanding their roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
Dennis, G., Sherman, B. T., Hosack, D. A., Yang, J., Gao, W., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2003) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3 · Cited by 9,327
Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line.
Boukamp, P., Petrussevska, R. T., Breitkreutz, D., Hornung, J., Markham, A., & Fusenig, N. E. (1988) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.106.3.761 · Cited by 4,170
Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes
Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Spieth, J., Hillier, L. W., Richards, S., et al. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3715005 · Cited by 3,971 · cited 2×
“base is in a conserved element, as described previously (48).”
BackgroundMethodSPECIFICITY AND VERSATILITY IN TGF-β SIGNALING THROUGH SMADS
Feng, X.-H., & Derynck, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018 · Cited by 1,869
Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor
Wendt, K. S., Yoshida, K., Itoh, T., Bando, M., Koch, B., Schirghuber, E., Tsutsumi, S., Nagae, G., Ishihara, K., Mishiro, T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06634 · Cited by 1,193
Smad3 and Smad4 cooperate with c-Jun/c-Fos to mediate TGF-β-induced transcription
Zhang, Y., Feng, X.-H., & Derynck, R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29814 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Massagué, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3434 · Cited by 3,128
TGF-β and the TGF-β family: context-dependent roles in cell and tissue physiology
Morikawa, M., Derynck, R., & Miyazono, K. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021873 · Cited by 1,321
Self-citationThe regulation of TGFβ signal transduction
Moustakas, A., & Heldin, C.-H. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.030338 · Cited by 832
TGF-β Promotes Heterogeneity and Drug Resistance in Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Oshimori, N., Oristian, D., & Fuchs, E. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.043 · Cited by 471
The dynamic roles of TGF‐β in cancer
Meulmeester, E., & ten Dijke, P. (2011) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2785 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Koinuma, D., Tsutsumi, S., Kamimura, N., Taniguchi, H., Miyazawa, K., Sunamura, M., Imamura, T., Miyazono, K., & Aburatani, H.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 172-186
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2111391000
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation on Microarray Analysis of Smad2/3 Binding Sites Reveals Roles of ETS1 and TFAP2A in Transforming Growth Factor β Signaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.01038-08
- The paper
- Koinuma, D., Tsutsumi, S., Kamimura, N., Taniguchi, H., Miyazawa, K., Sunamura, M., Imamura, T., Miyazono, K., & Aburatani, H. (2009). Chromatin Immunoprecipitation on Microarray Analysis of Smad2/3 Binding Sites Reveals Roles of ETS1 and TFAP2A in Transforming Growth Factor β Signaling. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01038-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.