CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WASH Knockout T Cells Demonstrate Defective Receptor Trafficking, Proliferation, and Effector Function

Piotrowski, Joshua T., Gomez, Timothy S., Schoon, Renee A., Mangalam, Ashutosh K., Billadeau, Daniel D.·2013·Molecular and Cellular Biology
DOI 10.1128/mcb.01288-12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.01288-12

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WASH is recruited to endosomes where it is necessary for branched F-actin deposition, a process essential to maintain endolysosomal network structure, promote fission of membrane tubules, and traffic cargo proteins.

    “WASH is recruited to endosomes where it is necessary for branched F-actin deposition, a process that is essential to maintain the structure of the endolysosomal network, to promote effective fission of membrane tubules and trafficking of cargo proteins37,39,41,43,44.”

    From Endosomal PI(3)P regulation by the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex controls membrane protein recycling (2019) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Introduction says WASH localizes to endomembranes and participates in trafficking through localized Arp2/3-dependent F-actin nucleation. The Results show collapsed endosomal and lysosomal compartments and defective cargo trafficking in WASH-deficient T cells. Our copy does not establish that this actin process promotes fission of membrane tubules; the References list an earlier study on endosome fission, but that title alone does not support the more specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Regulation of branched F-actin formation by WASH is needed for proper morphology of the endolysosomal system and endosomal trafficking of a broad range of cargoes.

    “Regulation of branched F-actin formation by WASH is needed for proper morphology of the endolysosomal system and endosomal trafficking of a broad range of cargoes37,39,41–44”

    From Endosomal PI(3)P regulation by the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex controls membrane protein recycling (2019) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Lasserre R, 2010, FEBS Lett., 584, 4845, 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.09.001 · DOI
  2. Kurisu S, 2009, Genome Biol., 10, 226, 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-226 · DOI
  3. Rottner K, 2010, Trends Cell Biol., 20, 650, 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.014 · DOI
  4. Badour K, 2003, Immunity, 18, 141, 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00516-2 · DOI
  5. Nolz JC, 2007, Mol. Cell. Biol., 27, 5986, 10.1128/MCB.00136-07 · DOI
  6. Burkhardt JK, 2008, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 26, 233, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090347 · DOI
  7. Cannon JL, 2004, J. Immunol., 173, 1658, 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.1658 · DOI
  8. Zhang J, 2009, Immunol. Rev., 232, 175, 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00846.x · DOI
  9. Zipfel PA, 2006, Curr. Biol., 16, 35, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.024 · DOI
  10. Campellone KG, 2008, Cell, 134, 148, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.032 · DOI
  11. Campellone KG, 2010, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 237, 10.1038/nrm2867 · DOI
  12. Zuchero JB, 2009, Nat. Cell Biol., 11, 451, 10.1038/ncb1852 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030237 · DOI
  14. Derivery E, 2009, Dev. Cell, 17, 712, 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gomez TS, 2009, Dev. Cell, 17, 699, 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jia D, 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107, 10442, 10.1073/pnas.0913293107 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Harbour ME, 2012, Biochem. J., 442, 209, 10.1042/BJ20111761 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jia D, 2012, Mol. Biol. Cell, 23, 2352, 10.1091/mbc.e11-12-1059 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Zech T, 2011, J. Cell Sci., 124, 3753, 10.1242/jcs.080986 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Temkin P, 2011, Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 717, 10.1038/ncb2252 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gomez TS, 2008, Adv. Immunol., 97, 1, 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)00001-1 · DOI
  22. Dawlaty MM, 2006, Methods, 39, 370, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.06.009 · DOI
  23. Gomez TS, 2012, Mol. Biol. Cell, 23, 3215, 10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0101 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Perchonock CE, 2007, J. Immunol., 179, 1768, 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1768 · DOI
  25. Billadeau DD, 2000, J. Exp. Med., 192, 381, 10.1084/jem.192.3.381 · DOI
  26. Kortum RL, 2011, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 12407, 10.1073/pnas.1104295108 · DOI
  27. Mangalam AK, 2004, Eur. J. Immunol., 34, 280, 10.1002/eji.200324597 · DOI
  28. Ting AT, 1992, J. Exp. Med., 176, 1751, 10.1084/jem.176.6.1751 · DOI
  29. Gomez TS, 2005, Nat. Immunol., 6, 261, 10.1038/ni1168 · DOI
  30. Livak KJ, 2001, Methods, 25, 402, 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Rodriguez-Mesa E, 2012, Dev. Dyn., 241, 608
  32. Lee PP, 2001, Immunity, 15, 763, 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00227-8 · DOI
  33. Liao W, 2011, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 23, 598, 10.1016/j.coi.2011.08.003 · DOI
  34. Hayashi S, 2002, Dev. Biol., 244, 305, 10.1006/dbio.2002.0597 · DOI
  35. Rudensky AY, 2011, Immunol. Rev., 241, 260, 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01018.x · DOI
  36. Krammer PH, 2007, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 7, 532, 10.1038/nri2115 · DOI
  37. Balagopalan L, 2009, Immunol. Rev., 232, 84, 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00840.x · DOI
  38. Das V, 2004, Immunity, 20, 577, 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00106-2 · DOI
  39. Finetti F, 2009, Nat. Cell Biol., 11, 1332, 10.1038/ncb1977 · DOI
  40. Badour K, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 1593, 10.1073/pnas.0610543104 · DOI
  41. Fox CJ, 2005, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 5, 844, 10.1038/nri1710 · DOI
  42. Frauwirth KA, 2004, J. Immunol., 172, 4661, 10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4661 · DOI
  43. Jacobs SR, 2008, J. Immunol., 180, 4476, 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4476 · DOI
  44. MacIver NJ, 2008, J. Leukoc. Biol., 84, 949, 10.1189/jlb.0108024 · DOI
  45. DeNucci CC, 2009, Crit. Rev. Immunol., 29, 87, 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v29.i2.10 · DOI
  46. Alcover A, 2000, Crit. Rev. Immunol., 20, 325, 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v20.i4.20 · DOI
  47. Wieman HL, 2007, Mol. Biol. Cell, 18, 1437, 10.1091/mbc.e06-07-0593 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Duleh SN, 2010, Cytoskeleton, 67, 193, 10.1002/cm.20437 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Carnell M, 2011, J. Cell Biol., 193, 831, 10.1083/jcb.201009119 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ciofani M, 2005, Nat. Immunol., 6, 881, 10.1038/ni1234 · DOI
  51. Wofford JA, 2008, Blood, 111, 2101, 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096297 · DOI
  52. Hayday AC, 2007, Nat. Immunol., 8, 137, 10.1038/ni1436 · DOI
  53. Paessens LC, 2008, Mol. Immunol., 45, 42, 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.05.016 · DOI
  54. Michalek RD, 2011, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 18348, 10.1073/pnas.1108856108 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Zhang J, 1998, Nature, 392, 296, 10.1038/32681 · DOI
  56. Rathmell JC, 2000, Mol. Cell, 6, 683, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00066-6 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Cullen PJ, 2008, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9, 574, 10.1038/nrm2427 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Hsu VW, 2010, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 22, 528, 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.05.008 · DOI
  59. Gamper CJ, 2010, Immunol. Res., 47, 162, 10.1007/s12026-009-8147-0 · DOI
  60. Riley JL, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 11790, 10.1073/pnas.162359999 · DOI
  61. Cemerski S, 2008, Immunity, 29, 414, 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.06.014 · DOI
  62. Tohyama Y, 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 2570, 10.1091/mbc.e02-09-0615 · DOI
  63. Fabbri M, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5793, 10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0413 · DOI
  64. Ouchida R, 2008, Immunity, 29, 33, 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.04.024 · DOI
  65. Swamy M, 2010, Cell Commun. Signal, 8, 5, 10.1186/1478-811X-8-5 · DOI
  66. Eyster CA, 2009, Traffic, 10, 590, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00894.x · DOI
  67. Cullen PJ, 2012, Nat. Cell Biol., 14, 29, 10.1038/ncb2374 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piotrowski, J. T., Gomez, T. S., Schoon, R. A., Mangalam, A. K., & Billadeau, D. D.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
958-973
ISSN
1098-5549
DOI
10.1128/mcb.01288-12
Cited by
101
References
4
Language
en
Licence
journals.asm.org/non-commercial-tdm-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review