Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

miR-29a and miR-29b Contribute to Pancreatic β-Cell-Specific Silencing of Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 (Mct1)

Pullen, Timothy J., da Silva Xavier, Gabriela, Kelsey, Gavin, Rutter, Guy A.·2011·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

In pancreatic β cells, elevated glucose concentrations stimulate mitochondrial oxidative metabolism to raise intracellular ATP/ADP levels, prompting insulin secretion. Unusually low levels of expression of genes encoding the plasma membrane monocarboxylate transporter, MCT1 (SLC16A1), as well as lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) ensure that glucose-derived pyruvate is efficiently metabolized by mitochondria, while exogenous lactate or pyruvate is unable to stimulate metabolism and hence insulin secretion inappropriately. We show here that whereas DNA methylation at the Mct1 promoter is unlikely to be involved in cell-type-specific transcriptional repression, three microRNAs (miRNAs), miR-29a, miR-29b, and miR-124, selectively target both human and mouse MCT1 3' untranslated regions. Mutation of the cognate miR-29 or miR-124 binding sites abolishes the effects of the corresponding miRNAs, demonstrating a direct action of these miRNAs on the MCT1 message. However, despite reports of its expression in the mouse β-cell line MIN6, miR-124 was not detectably expressed in mature mouse islets. In contrast, the three isoforms of miR-29 are highly expressed and enriched in mouse islets. We show that inhibition of miR-29a in primary mouse islets increases Mct1 mRNA levels, demonstrating that miR-29 isoforms contribute to the β-cell-specific silencing of the MCT1 transporter and may thus affect insulin release.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.01433-10

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Baroukh N., 2007, J. Biol. Chem, 282, 19575, 10.1074/jbc.M611841200 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Betel D., 2008, Nucleic Acids Res, 36, D149, 10.1093/nar/gkm995 · DOI
  3. Bock C., 2005, Bioinformatics, 21, 4067, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti652 · DOI
  4. Bravo-Egana V., 2008, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 366, 922, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.052 · DOI
  5. Carthew R. W., 2009, Cell, 136, 642, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035 · DOI
  6. Chen C., 2005, Nucleic Acids Res, 33, e179, 10.1093/nar/gni178 · DOI
  7. Clark S. J., 2006, Nat. Protoc, 1, 2353, 10.1038/nprot.2006.324 · DOI
  8. Correa-Medina M., 2009, Gene Expr. Patterns, 9, 193, 10.1016/j.gep.2008.12.003 · DOI
  9. Didiano D., 2006, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 13, 849, 10.1038/nsmb1138 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Diraison F., 2004, Biochem. J, 378, 769, 10.1042/bj20031277 · DOI
  11. Fred R. G., 2010, PLoS One, 5, e10843, 10.1371/journal.pone.0010843 · DOI
  12. Graham F. L., 1977, J. Gen. Virol, 36, 59, 10.1099/0022-1317-36-1-59 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Halestrap A. P., 2004, Pflugers Arch, 447, 619, 10.1007/s00424-003-1067-2 · DOI
  14. Halestrap A. P., 1999, Biochem. J, 343, 281, 10.1042/bj3430281 · DOI
  15. Illingworth R., 2008, PLoS Biol, 6, e22, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060022 · DOI
  16. Ishihara H., 1999, J. Clin. Invest, 104, 1621, 10.1172/JCI7515 · DOI
  17. John B., 2004, PLoS Biol, 2, e363, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020363 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kloosterman W. P., 2007, PLoS Biol, 5, e203, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050203 · DOI
  19. Levrat F., 1993, Exp. Cell Res, 209, 307, 10.1006/excr.1993.1315 · DOI
  20. Li K. K., 2009, Hum. Pathol, 40, 1234, 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.02.003 · DOI
  21. Li L. C., 2002, Bioinformatics, 18, 1427, 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1427 · DOI
  22. Liang Y., 1996, Am. J. Physiol, 270, E846
  23. Lovis P., 2008, Biol. Chem, 389, 305, 10.1515/BC.2008.026 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Millar D. S., 2002, Methods, 27, 108, 10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00061-0 · DOI
  25. Miyazaki J., 1990, Endocrinology, 127, 126, 10.1210/endo-127-1-126 · DOI
  26. Mueller W. C., 2009, Recent Results Cancer Res, 171, 217, 10.1007/978-3-540-31206-2_13 · DOI
  27. Murchison E. P., 2004, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol, 16, 223, 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.04.003 · DOI
  28. Otonkoski T., 2007, Am. J. Hum. Genet, 81, 467, 10.1086/520960 · DOI
  29. Otonkoski T., 2003, Diabetes, 52, 199, 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.199 · DOI
  30. Parton L. E., 2006, Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab, 291, E982, 10.1152/ajpendo.00067.2006 · DOI
  31. Plaisance V., 2006, J. Biol. Chem, 281, 26932, 10.1074/jbc.M601225200 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Poy M. N., 2009, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 106, 5813, 10.1073/pnas.0810550106 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rutter G. A, 2004, The Minkowski Lecture 2004. Diabetologia, 47, 1861
  34. Sambrook J., 2001, Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual
  35. Sekine N., 1994, J. Biol. Chem, 269, 4895, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37629-9 · DOI
  36. Thorrez L., 2011, Genome Res, 21, 95, 10.1101/gr.109173.110 · DOI
  37. van Arensbergen J., 2010, Genome Res, 20, 722, 10.1101/gr.101709.109 · DOI
  38. Weber M., 2005, Nat. Genet, 37, 853, 10.1038/ng1598 · DOI
  39. Zhao C., 1998, FEBS Lett, 430, 213, 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00600-0 · DOI
  40. Zhao C., 2001, Diabetes, 50, 361, 10.2337/diabetes.50.2.361 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Pullen, T. J., da Silva Xavier, G., Kelsey, G., & Rutter, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Cell Biology, Division of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, United Kingdom
  • Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
31
Issue
15
Pages
3182-3194
ISSN
1098-5549
Cited by
258
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review